StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Text Editor
  5. ESLint vs Notepad++

ESLint vs Notepad++

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Notepad++
Notepad++
Stacks20.4K
Followers16.8K
Votes421
ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K

ESLint vs Notepad++: What are the differences?

Introduction:

ESLint and Notepad++ are both widely used tools in the field of software development. However, they differ in various aspects that make them distinct from each other. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between ESLint and Notepad++ in detail.

  1. Linting Capabilities: ESLint is a powerful static code analysis tool that helps identify and report issues in JavaScript code. It enforces coding standards and best practices, providing developers with helpful feedback to improve code quality. On the other hand, Notepad++ is a text editor that lacks built-in linting capabilities, requiring additional plugins or external tools for code analysis.

  2. Extensibility: ESLint is highly extensible and customizable, allowing developers to define their own rules or use popular presets to enforce coding standards. It supports various plugins and configurations, providing flexibility to adapt to different project requirements. In contrast, Notepad++ has limited extensibility options, with a relatively smaller range of plugins available. It primarily focuses on providing a lightweight and efficient text editing experience.

  3. Ease of Use: ESLint is typically integrated into development workflows, allowing real-time code analysis and immediate feedback during coding. It can be seamlessly integrated with popular code editors and integrated development environments (IDEs), enhancing developer productivity. Notepad++, although widely used as a code editor, lacks native integration with development workflows and may require additional steps to achieve similar functionality.

  4. Code Formatting: ESLint not only identifies issues but also has the ability to automatically fix certain code formatting problems, adhering to consistent coding style across the codebase. This feature saves developers time and effort in manually formatting code. On the other hand, Notepad++ does not provide built-in code formatting and requires additional plugins or external tools for this purpose.

  5. Language Support: ESLint primarily focuses on JavaScript, with support for ECMAScript standards and JSX syntax commonly used in frameworks like React. It can analyze and enforce coding standards in modern JavaScript applications. On the other hand, Notepad++ is a general-purpose text editor that can handle various programming languages, making it suitable for a broader range of use cases beyond JavaScript development.

  6. Ease of Installation and Setup: ESLint can be easily installed and configured in a project using its command-line interface or package managers like npm or yarn. It provides clear instructions and documentation to quickly get started. Notepad++, being a standalone text editor, generally requires a straightforward installation process but may need additional plugins or configurations for specific development needs.

In summary, ESLint is a powerful linting tool with extensive support for JavaScript development, providing code analysis, styling enforcement, and formatting capabilities. Notepad++ is a lightweight text editor with broader language support but lacks native linting features and advanced extensibility options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Notepad++, ESLint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments
Andrey
Andrey

Managing Partner at WhiteLabelDevelopers

May 18, 2020

Decided

Since communication with Github is not necessary, the Atom is less convenient in working with text and code. Sublim's support and understanding of projects is best for us. Notepad for us is a completely outdated solution with an unacceptable interface. We use a good theme for Sublim ayu-dark

539k views539k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Notepad++
Notepad++
ESLint
ESLint

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Syntax Highlighting and Syntax Folding;User Defined Syntax Highlighting and Folding: screenshot 1, screenshot 2, screenshot 3 and screenshot 4;PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expression) Search/Replace;GUI entirely customizable: minimalist, tab with close button, multi-line tab, vertical tab and vertical document list;Document Map;Auto-completion: Word completion, Function completion and Function parameters hint;Multi-Document (Tab interface);Multi-View;WYSIWYG (Printing);Zoom in and zoom out;Multi-Language environment supported;Bookmark;Macro recording and playback;Launch with different arguments
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
20.4K
Stacks
38.6K
Followers
16.8K
Followers
14.0K
Votes
421
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 104
    Syntax for all languages that i use
  • 60
    Tabbed ui
  • 56
    Great code editor
  • 54
    Fast and lightweight
  • 38
    Plugins
Cons
  • 3
    No default plugin manager
  • 2
    Can't install more advanced packets
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 6
    Free
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Notepad++, ESLint?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Emacs

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Neovim

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana