StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. ESLint vs PHPStan

ESLint vs PHPStan

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K
PHPStan
PHPStan
Stacks418
Followers99
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.7K
Forks933

ESLint vs PHPStan: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, we will discuss the key differences between ESLint and PHPStan. Both tools are widely used for code analysis in different programming languages and offer unique features that cater to the specific needs of their respective ecosystems.

  1. Architecture: ESLint is primarily designed for JavaScript and follows a modular architecture that allows users to enable/disable specific rules based on their project requirements. On the other hand, PHPStan is built specifically for PHP and provides static analysis of the codebase without the need for explicit configuration.

  2. Language Support: ESLint focuses solely on JavaScript and its various frameworks and libraries, providing a wide range of customizable rules and plugins. PHPStan, on the other hand, is dedicated to PHP and has in-depth knowledge of the PHP language and its specific coding standards.

  3. Type Checking: ESLint offers limited support for type checking by using third-party plugins like TypeScript ESLint, Flow, etc. However, its primary focus is on linting and enforcing code style. PHPStan, in contrast, excels in type checking and performs advanced static analysis to detect type-related issues, such as invalid function arguments or incompatible type assignments.

  4. Integration: Both ESLint and PHPStan can be easily integrated into modern development workflows. However, ESLint has better integration with popular code editors and build tools for JavaScript, making it more convenient for developers working on JavaScript projects. PHPStan integrates well with popular PHP frameworks and can be used as part of continuous integration pipelines.

  5. Community Support: ESLint has a larger and more active community due to its wider adoption in the JavaScript ecosystem. This leads to extensive plugin and configuration options, making it highly customizable. PHPStan, although having a growing community, still lacks some of the features and customizability that ESLint offers.

In Summary, the key differences between ESLint and PHPStan lie in their language support, architecture, type checking capabilities, integration options, and community support. While ESLint is highly flexible and widely used for JavaScript linting, PHPStan provides comprehensive analysis specifically for PHP code, especially in terms of type checking.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ESLint, PHPStan

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ESLint
ESLint
PHPStan
PHPStan

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

It focuses on finding errors in your code without actually running it. It catches whole classes of bugs even before you write tests for the code. It moves PHP closer to compiled languages in the sense that the correctness of each line of the code can be checked before you run the actual line.

-
Static Analysis Tool ;Focuses on finding errors in your code without actually running it;Extensible;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Stars
13.7K
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
933
Stacks
38.6K
Stacks
418
Followers
14.0K
Followers
99
Votes
28
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Focuses code review on quality not style
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Drupal
Drupal
WordPress
WordPress
Laravel
Laravel
PHP
PHP
Symfony
Symfony
Yii
Yii
Nette Framework
Nette Framework
Typo3
Typo3
Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Doctrine 2
Doctrine 2

What are some alternatives to ESLint, PHPStan?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana