Overview

Experitest

Stacks8

Followers37

Votes0

Karate DSL

Stacks148

Followers268

Votes85

Experitest vs Karate DSL: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Experitest and Karate DSL are two popular tools used in the software testing industry. Both tools have their own unique features and advantages, making them suitable for different use cases.

Testing Approach: Experitest is a commercial tool that focuses on mobile testing, providing a wide range of testing capabilities for mobile applications. On the other hand, Karate DSL is an open-source tool that emphasizes API testing with a clear and easy-to-understand syntax for writing test cases.
Language Support: Experitest supports multiple programming languages like Java, C#, Python, etc., making it versatile for teams with different language preferences. In contrast, Karate DSL utilizes a simplified script syntax based on Gherkin and JSON, which may limit some language-specific functionalities.
Integration Capabilities: Experitest offers seamless integrations with major CI/CD tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, etc., enabling automated testing in the continuous integration pipelines. In comparison, Karate DSL provides built-in integration with tools like Maven and Gradle, streamlining the test automation process for API testing projects.
Community Support: Karate DSL benefits from a strong and active community of users and developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums for users to troubleshoot issues and collaborate on best practices. Experitest, being a commercial tool, may have limited community support and resources available for users.
License Cost: One significant difference between Experitest and Karate DSL is the cost associated with each tool. Experitest requires a paid license for full access to its features, making it more suitable for enterprise-level organizations with a dedicated budget for testing tools. On the other hand, Karate DSL is open-source and freely available for anyone to use, making it a cost-effective option for small to medium-sized teams.
Learning Curve: Experitest may have a steeper learning curve for new users due to its comprehensive feature set and complex setup process, requiring additional time and resources for training. Karate DSL, with its straightforward syntax and clear documentation, offers a more beginner-friendly learning curve, allowing users to quickly adapt and start writing test cases efficiently.

In Summary, Experitest and Karate DSL differ in their testing approach, language support, integration capabilities, community support, cost, and learning curve, catering to diverse testing requirements and user preferences in the software testing landscape.

🔥 Trending in Testing Frameworks on StackShare

Rhesis AI Testing Frameworks

Rhesis AI

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Detailed Comparison

Experitest	Karate DSL
It allows users to create and run Appium, Selenium, XCUITest & Espresso tests against real devices and web browsers. Users can create & execute hundreds of manual or automated tests in parallel on IOS & Android devices. Users can automate their cross-browser testing, perform visual testing and access advanced analytics.	Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.
Live mobile app testing; Automated mobile app testing; Live cross-browser testing; Automated cross-browser testing; Visual testing; Global data centers; Test development; Open source compatibility; Large scale test execution; Integrations with CI tools; Integrations with development and testing tools	Native support for both JSON and XML; Powerful payload assertions with "deep-equals"; Data-driven testing; Easy even for non-programmers; Embedded JavaScript engine; Test-doubles or HTTP mocking built-in; Re-use test scripts as performance-tests; Environment switching; Comprehensive reports, supported by all CI tools
Statistics
Stacks 8	Stacks 148
Followers 37	Followers 268
Votes 0	Votes 85
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 11 Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI 9 Easy for even non-programmers to get started 9 Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses 7 Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources 5 Comprehensive documentation and examples Cons 1 Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern 1 Karate uses its own scripting language 1 There is no IntelliSense support in IDE 1 Finding errors in code is not easy 1 Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b
Integrations
Bamboo Java C# Visual Studio JavaScript Jenkins X TestNG Ruby Eclipse Selenium	JavaScript Visual Studio Code Java Cucumber IntelliJ IDEA JUnit Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Experitest, Karate DSL?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Appium

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.