StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Micro vs fabric8

Micro vs fabric8

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Micro
Micro
Stacks89
Followers55
Votes2
fabric8
fabric8
Stacks37
Followers113
Votes1
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks498

Micro vs fabric8: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Micro and fabric8 are both popular platforms used in the field of microservices. While they share similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. Below are the top 6 differences between Micro and fabric8.

1. **Architecture**: Micro follows a more traditional microservices architecture, with its primary components being a service registry, API gateway, and messaging system. On the other hand, fabric8 is built on top of Kubernetes and focuses on providing a seamless experience for building, deploying, and managing microservices in a Kubernetes environment.

2. **Extensibility**: Micro provides a modular framework that allows users to easily extend its functionality through plugins. In contrast, fabric8 focuses on tight integration with Kubernetes and provides a rich set of tools and features that are tailored specifically for working within a Kubernetes cluster.

3. **Community Support**: Micro has a large and active community that contributes to its development and provides support to users. Fabric8, being an Eclipse Foundation project, benefits from the resources and support provided by the Eclipse community, which includes tools, plugins, and documentation specifically tailored for fabric8 users.

4. **Ease of Use**: Micro is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for developers looking to quickly get started with building and deploying microservices. Fabric8, while more powerful and feature-rich, can be more complex to set up and configure due to its deep integration with Kubernetes.

5. **Monitoring and Logging**: Micro provides basic monitoring and logging capabilities out of the box, which can be extended with additional plugins. Fabric8, on the other hand, comes with built-in support for advanced monitoring, logging, and tracing tools, leveraging Kubernetes native capabilities for observability.

6. **Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD)**: Micro focuses on providing a lightweight and flexible CI/CD pipeline that can be easily customized based on individual project requirements. Fabric8, built on top of Jenkins and Tekton, offers a more robust and scalable CI/CD solution that is tightly integrated with Kubernetes.

In Summary, Micro and fabric8 differ in their architecture, extensibility, community support, ease of use, monitoring/logging capabilities, and CI/CD features, catering to different needs and preferences in the world of microservices development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Micro
Micro
fabric8
fabric8

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

fabric8 makes it easy to create microservices, build, test and deploy them via Continuous Delivery pipelines then run and manage them with Continuous Improvement and ChatOps.

Authentication; Config Management; Key-Value Storage; API Gateway; Service Discovery; Event Streaming
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
498
Stacks
89
Stacks
37
Followers
55
Followers
113
Votes
2
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Great flexibility
  • 1
    Nice tooling
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to build and automate integration testing
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Micro, fabric8?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana