Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Fanout

6
33
+ 1
0
Socket.IO

13.4K
10.9K
+ 1
776
Add tool

Fanout vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Introduction: Fanout and Socket.IO are popular real-time messaging technologies used for communication between clients and servers in web applications.

  1. Protocol Support: Fanout uses the WebSocket protocol for real-time communication, providing a full-duplex communication channel over a single, long-lived connection. In contrast, Socket.IO is a real-time library that abstracts the implementation details and provides fallback options such as polling and long-polling in cases where WebSockets are not supported.

  2. Scalability: Fanout is designed to be highly scalable out of the box, allowing for horizontal scaling through the use of numerous instances and a load balancer. On the other hand, Socket.IO's scalability is more limited as it may require additional configurations and strategies for handling a high volume of concurrent connections.

  3. Customization: Fanout is more focused on providing a simple and efficient real-time messaging solution, with fewer customization options. Socket.IO, on the other hand, offers more flexibility and customization capabilities through its various configuration options and plugins.

  4. Real-time Features: Fanout emphasizes real-time messaging features such as message delivery guarantees, message expiration, and message deduplication. Socket.IO also offers real-time messaging capabilities, but may require additional modules or custom implementations for advanced features.

  5. Client Compatibility: Fanout provides client libraries for various platforms and languages, making it easy to integrate with different client applications. Socket.IO also offers client libraries for popular platforms like JavaScript, but may require some additional work for compatibility with certain environments or languages.

  6. Community and Support: Socket.IO has a larger community of developers and more extensive documentation, making it easier to find resources and support when working with the technology. Fanout, while still well-supported, may have fewer resources available in comparison.

In Summary, Fanout and Socket.IO have distinct differences in terms of protocol support, scalability, customization, real-time features, client compatibility, and community support.

Advice on Fanout and Socket.IO
Moghammad Sabre Khan
Needs advice
on
FirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We (my team) are building an App where we want to have Bi-directional texting, Single Directional Picture, and audio transfer.

We are building all this using Flutter.

There will essentially be 3 apps, 2 Mobile-based (Android and iOS) and 1 Microsoft Based. We've built up most of the code already, and made a few major mistakes but fixed it(namely had no proper state management).

How things will work:

Person A has a Mobile app 1, Person A presses a button that sends a "communication request" into a Pool of requests. Person B on Desktop App chooses a "communication request" from the pool, and engages in Bi-directional texting with Person A. Person B also opens communication with Person C who is on Mobile app 2, and they engage in Bi-directional texting. Person C will be notified of communication requests through Push Notifications.

So far we've been using Socket.IO, however, I'm starting to think that's not the best.

A problem we've encountered so far is that Person A(Mobile App 1 User), is the person who sends a "communication request" into the "Communication Pool". The Mobile App 1 User, can "cancel" the communication at any point in time. When they do that, I would like for a notification to be sent to Person B, the Desktop User, For them to pick up another communication request.

I am not sure how this should be done however, should it be done in the Back-end, then how does the Front-end get notified of the change?

Any advice on which to choose?

See more
Replies (1)
Jomai Omar
web developer at tunisofts · | 3 upvotes · 18.3K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebaseSocket.IOSocket.IO

It's so simple when you use Firebase to manage the requests just make new field to the request for example callstate with values like "requesting" "incall" "cancelled" and both A and B can update this field.

See more
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 496.2K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Fanout
Pros of Socket.IO
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 219
      Real-time
    • 143
      Node.js
    • 141
      Event-based communication
    • 102
      Open source
    • 102
      WebSockets
    • 26
      Binary streaming
    • 21
      No internet dependency
    • 10
      Large community
    • 6
      Push notification
    • 5
      Ease of access and setup
    • 1
      Test

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Fanout
    Cons of Socket.IO
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 12
        Bad documentation
      • 4
        Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
      • 3
        Doesn't work on React Native
      • 2
        Small community
      • 2
        Websocket Errors

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      944
      442
      1.5K
      573
      16

      What is Fanout?

      Fanout makes it easy to build realtime APIs and apps. The product is a cross between a reverse proxy and a message broker. Receivers subscribe to channels, and published data is delivered in realtime.

      What is Socket.IO?

      It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Fanout?
      What companies use Socket.IO?
        No companies found
        Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
        Learn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Fanout?
        What tools integrate with Socket.IO?
          No integrations found

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          Blog Posts

          What are some alternatives to Fanout and Socket.IO?
          Pushpin
          Pushpin is a reverse proxy server that makes it easy to build realtime web services. The project is unique among realtime push solutions in that it is designed to address the needs of API creators.
          Pusher
          Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.
          NGINX
          nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
          Apache HTTP Server
          The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.
          Amazon EC2
          It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
          See all alternatives