StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Gradle vs fastlane

Gradle vs fastlane

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gradle
Gradle
Stacks24.3K
Followers9.8K
Votes254
GitHub Stars18.1K
Forks5.0K
fastlane
fastlane
Stacks716
Followers437
Votes74
GitHub Stars40.6K
Forks6.0K

Gradle vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Gradle and fastlane are both widely used build automation tools in software development. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.
  1. Build Script Language: The primary difference between Gradle and fastlane lies in their build script languages. Gradle uses a powerful and flexible language called Groovy, which allows developers to write highly expressive and customizable build scripts. On the other hand, fastlane utilizes a configuration-based approach with a domain-specific language (DSL), which simplifies the build process by abstracting away complex logic and providing predefined actions for common tasks.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Another notable difference between Gradle and fastlane is their platform compatibility. Gradle is a versatile build tool that is widely compatible with various platforms, including Android, iOS, and web. It offers extensive support for cross-platform development and can be easily integrated into existing build pipelines. In contrast, fastlane is primarily focused on iOS and Android app development, providing a streamlined workflow for automating various tasks specific to mobile application development.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Gradle boasts a large and vibrant community, supported by the Gradle build ecosystem. It offers a rich set of plugins and extensions that can be leveraged to enhance the build process, integrate with other tools, and customize workflows according to specific project requirements. Fastlane also has a strong community support but is relatively more focused on mobile application development, with a dedicated community of developers and a vast array of pre-built plugins specifically tailored for iOS and Android automation.

  4. Integration with App Stores: One significant difference between Gradle and fastlane lies in their integration with app stores. Gradle provides native support for publishing Android apps to the Google Play Store, allowing developers to automate the deployment process seamlessly. Fastlane, on the other hand, is specifically designed to simplify the release process of iOS and Android apps. It provides integrated actions for automating app store submissions, managing certificates and provisioning profiles, and handling code signing for streamlined app deployment.

  5. Plugin and Dependency Management: Gradle excels in its ability to manage project dependencies efficiently. It integrates seamlessly with popular dependency management systems like Maven and Ivy, allowing developers to easily incorporate external libraries and frameworks into their projects. Fastlane, while not focused on dependency management like Gradle, provides a set of actions and plugins to handle specific tasks related to mobile app automation, such as managing code signing certificates, publishing releases to app stores, running quality checks, and generating screenshots.

  6. Project Configurability: Gradle offers extensive configurability, allowing developers to customize the build process to meet specific project requirements. It provides a declarative approach to define tasks and workflows, enabling developers to define complex build logic using Groovy's expressive syntax. In contrast, fastlane promotes a convention-over-configuration approach, simplifying and standardizing the build process for iOS and Android apps. It encourages developers to follow predefined conventions and workflows, reducing the need for extensive configuration.

In Summary, Gradle and fastlane differ in terms of build script language, platform compatibility, community and ecosystem, integration with app stores, plugin and dependency management, and project configurability. These differences cater to specific development needs and serve as deciding factors when choosing between the two tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gradle
Gradle
fastlane
fastlane

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Declarative builds and build-by-convention;Language for dependency based programming;Structure your build;Deep API;Gradle scales;Multi-project builds;Many ways to manage your dependencies;Gradle is the first build integration tool
Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.1K
GitHub Stars
40.6K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
6.0K
Stacks
24.3K
Stacks
716
Followers
9.8K
Followers
437
Votes
254
Votes
74
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 110
    Flexibility
  • 51
    Easy to use
  • 47
    Groovy dsl
  • 22
    Slow build time
  • 10
    Crazy memory leaks
Cons
  • 8
    Inactionnable documentation
  • 6
    It is just the mess of Ant++
  • 4
    Hard to decide: ten or more ways to achieve one goal
  • 2
    Dependency on groovy
  • 2
    Bad Eclipse tooling
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 13
    Itunes connect deployment
  • 11
    Incredible flexability
  • 9
    Third party integrations
Integrations
No integrations available
Testmunk
Testmunk
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
TestFlight
TestFlight
HockeyApp
HockeyApp
HipChat
HipChat
Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Gradle, fastlane?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Bitrise

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Greenhouse

Greenhouse

Greenhouse automatically builds your project for every commit you make and runs all your unit or UI tests on the emulator/simulator or on real hardware. Automatic build distribution is also supported so that your team and clients are always up to date with the latest state of your apps.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Codemagic

Codemagic

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana