StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Beta Testing Mobile App Distribution
  5. TestFlight vs fastlane

TestFlight vs fastlane

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestFlight
TestFlight
Stacks1.1K
Followers705
Votes163
fastlane
fastlane
Stacks716
Followers437
Votes74
GitHub Stars40.6K
Forks6.0K

TestFlight vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between TestFlight and fastlane.

  1. Deployment Process: TestFlight provides a seamless and simplified process for deploying iOS apps by allowing developers to distribute beta builds to testers. On the other hand, fastlane automates the entire deployment process, including building, signing, and distributing apps across multiple platforms like iOS and Android.

  2. Integration: TestFlight is integrated directly into Apple's developer tools and services, making it the default choice for iOS app testing and distribution. In contrast, fastlane can be easily integrated with various CI/CD tools and third-party services, making it a more flexible option for cross-platform development.

  3. Automation and Customization: While TestFlight offers limited automation capabilities, fastlane is designed specifically for automating repetitive tasks in the app development lifecycle. With fastlane, developers can create custom workflows and automate tasks like screenshots generation, code signing, and uploading the app to app stores.

  4. Code Quality and Testing: TestFlight focuses primarily on beta testing and user feedback, providing tools for gathering feedback and tracking app crashes. In contrast, fastlane puts more emphasis on code quality and testing, offering multiple tools for automating unit tests, UI tests, and code review.

  5. Community and Support: As a part of Apple's ecosystem, TestFlight benefits from the widespread community and official support channels available. Fastlane, though community-driven, has a strong and active community that offers extensive documentation, forums, and plugins for various use cases.

  6. Usability and Learning Curve: TestFlight is relatively easy to use, especially for developers already familiar with Apple's ecosystem. Fastlane, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its wide range of features and configuration options, but offers more flexibility and control once mastered.

In Summary, TestFlight is a straightforward and integrated solution for iOS app testing and distribution, while fastlane provides automation, customization, and cross-platform support for the app development process.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestFlight
TestFlight
fastlane
fastlane

With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air.

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Sessions- Discover how testers are using your application. Watch as they progress and take unexpected turns.;Crash Reports- Reported in realtime, with environment snapshots and full session activity.;In-App Questions- The most effective way to get tester feedback. Get the answers you need by asking questions the moment a checkpoint is passed.;Checkpoints- Place checkpoints throughout your app to see how far testers are getting, confirm which areas are popular and reveal ones that need more testing.;Remote Logging- TFLogs are attached to your session and crash reports.;In-App Updates- Prompt testers to install the latest version of your app. This is the easiest way for your testers to take advantage of installing on the fly.
Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
40.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.0K
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
716
Followers
705
Followers
437
Votes
163
Votes
74
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Must have for ios development
  • 49
    Beta testing
  • 20
    Easy setup
  • 10
    Easy way to push out updates for internal testers
  • 7
    In-App Updates
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 13
    Itunes connect deployment
  • 11
    Incredible flexability
  • 9
    Third party integrations
Integrations
Trigger.io
Trigger.io
Testmunk
Testmunk
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HockeyApp
HockeyApp
HipChat
HipChat
Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
Hall
Hall

What are some alternatives to TestFlight, fastlane?

Bitrise

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

HockeyApp

HockeyApp

HockeyApp is the best way to collect live crash reports, get feedback from your users, distribute your betas, and analyze your test coverage.

Greenhouse

Greenhouse

Greenhouse automatically builds your project for every commit you make and runs all your unit or UI tests on the emulator/simulator or on real hardware. Automatic build distribution is also supported so that your team and clients are always up to date with the latest state of your apps.

TestFairy

TestFairy

When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more.

Beta by Crashlytics

Beta by Crashlytics

A streamlined solution for distributing apps that gives you a single, cross-platform toolset for iOS and Android, and a delightful, effortless onboarding for your testers.

Codemagic

Codemagic

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

Fabric by Twitter

Fabric by Twitter

Installing and managing a wide range of SDKs can be cumbersome and complex. Fabric solves this problem by combining all seven of our SDKs under one roof and organizing them into three Kits: the Crashlytics Kit, the Twitter Kit, and the MoPub Kit.

Appcircle

Appcircle

Mobile CI/CD from small teams to on-premises Enterprise solutions, Appcircle is a mobile CI/CD platform that provides a fully automated environment to manage mobile app lifecycle end-to-end.

Distiller

Distiller

Distiller's hosted continuous integration platform takes the pain out of mobile development through automated build, test, and deployment of your iOS apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana