Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Flask vs Phalcon: What are the differences?
## Key Differences Between Flask and Phalcon
1. **Architecture**: Flask follows the WSGI design allowing flexibility and customization in building web applications, while Phalcon utilizes C-extension to improve performance, making it faster compared to Flask in handling requests.
2. **Documentation**: Flask is known for its extensive documentation which makes it easier for beginners to grasp and use its features effectively, whereas Phalcon's documentation might not be as detailed, potentially posing a challenge for new users.
3. **Performance**: Phalcon is generally faster than Flask due to its architecture and use of C-extension, making it a preferred choice for applications with high-performance demands. Flask, on the other hand, is more lightweight and straightforward but may not offer the same level of speed.
4. **Community and Ecosystem**: Flask has a larger community and a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions available, providing a more extensive range of tools and resources for developers. However, Phalcon's community is more niche and may offer less variety in terms of third-party integrations and support.
5. **Learning Curve**: Flask is known for its simplicity and beginner-friendly nature, making it easier for newcomers to learn and start building web applications quickly. In contrast, Phalcon has a steeper learning curve due to its unique architecture and may require more time and effort to master effectively.
6. **Flexibility and Customization**: Flask offers high flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to build applications according to their specific requirements and preferences without any constraints. In contrast, Phalcon provides a more structured approach with predefined components and functionalities, offering less flexibility but promoting faster development in some cases.
In Summary, Flask and Phalcon differ in their architecture, documentation, performance, community, learning curve, and flexibility, catering to different needs and preferences of developers building web applications.
My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.
Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?
If you want to be a Web developer with knowledge in another frontend and NoSql technology, maybe continue with Flask. However, if you want to create very fast solutions to grow up with a new business and merge these with data analysis and other tools, Django is the answer. Basically read more about the service architecture where you feel more comfortable, Microservice or Monolithic, but please will not married with any because they solve issues to different contexts.
Which is the best Python framework for microservices?
We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.
Bottle is much less bloated and fast. Its built-in templating system is one of the fastest as it compiles the templates in bytecode. Also Bottle has no depenencies, preventing dependency bloat.
I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.
I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?
Here are some features I am looking for:
Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.
Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.
Support for swagger/ OpenAPI
Support for JSON Web Token
Support for test case coverage report
Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.
For starters flask provides a beautiful and easy way to create REST APIs. Also its supported by excellent beginner docs as well as a very active community. Another good thing with Flask is its widely available list of plugins which allow you to build as you go. Its also good in performance and can scale to a quite decent level. However, if you are sure your project is going to be fairly big, it would be better to start with Django as it provides a lot of features out of the box and is extremely stable in performance. Both these frameworks have support for Swagger, JWT, Coverage Report although you have to install plugins for them. Deploying both of these are fairly simple and there is huge documentation available. Django has one of the best documentations I have come across. I hope I was able to answer your queries.
Pros of Flask
- For it flexibility10
- Flexibilty and easy to use9
- User friendly7
- Secured6
- Unopinionated5
- Secure2
- Customizable2
- Simple to use1
- Powerful1
- Rapid development1
- Flask1
- Easy to get started1
- Easy to develop and maintain applications1
- Easy to setup and get it going1
- Easy to use1
- Documentation1
- Beautiful code1
- Orm1
- Not JS1
- Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.1
- Easy to integrate1
- Speed1
- Get started quickly1
- Python1
- Minimal1
- Lightweight1
- Flexibilty0
- Well designed0
- Productive0
- Awesome0
- Open source0
- Expressive0
- Love it0
Pros of Phalcon
- Fast65
- High performance54
- Open source37
- Fast and easy to use35
- Scalable32
- Versatile23
- Fiexble22
- Automatic routing20
- It is easy and fast19
- Is very good17
- Low overhead9
- Dependency injection9
- Awesome6
- Easy and fast2
- Great for API1
- Clean Architecture1
- Modularity1
- Easy Setup1
- Very customizable0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Flask
- Not JS10
- Context7
- Not fast5
- Don't has many module as in spring1
Cons of Phalcon
- Support few databases4
- Very bad documentation2