Flux CD vs Lagoon

Overview

Flux CD

Stacks81

Followers76

Votes1

GitHub Stars6.9K

Forks1.1K

Lagoon

Stacks6

Followers7

Votes0

Flux CD vs Lagoon: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Flux CD and Lagoon, it is important to understand the key differences between these two tools for managing Kubernetes applications and infrastructure.

Architecture: Flux CD follows a GitOps approach where the desired state of the cluster is defined in Git, allowing for a declarative infrastructure management. In contrast, Lagoon is a container-based platform that focuses on managing and deploying containerized applications on Kubernetes clusters, without requiring Git as the source of truth.
Scope of Functionality: Flux CD primarily focuses on continuous delivery and automation of deployments, allowing users to easily automate the process of deploying new versions of applications. On the other hand, Lagoon provides a comprehensive platform for managing the entire lifecycle of containerized applications from development to deployment, including build, test, and deployment processes.
Integration with CI/CD Tools: Flux CD integrates well with various CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins and GitLab CI, to automate the deployment process based on changes in the Git repository. Lagoon, however, includes its own CI system that is tightly integrated with the platform, providing a seamless experience for developers to build, test, and deploy their applications.
Deployment Flexibility: Flux CD offers flexibility in terms of deployment strategies, supporting strategies such as canary deployments and blue-green deployments to ensure zero downtime during updates. Lagoon, on the other hand, provides a standardized deployment workflow that simplifies the process of deploying applications without the need for advanced deployment strategies.
Community Support: Flux CD is maintained by the Flux project community, which provides regular updates, bug fixes, and new features to ensure the tool remains up-to-date and reliable. Lagoon, on the other hand, is supported by the amazee.io community, offering dedicated support and resources for users to troubleshoot issues and access documentation.
Scalability and Extensibility: Flux CD is designed to be highly scalable and extensible, allowing users to customize and extend its functionality through the use of custom controllers and operators. In comparison, Lagoon offers a more opinionated approach to managing containerized applications, focusing on simplicity and ease of use rather than extensibility and customization.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Flux CD and Lagoon is essential for choosing the right tool for managing Kubernetes applications and infrastructure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Flux CD	Lagoon
It is a tool that automatically ensures that the state of your Kubernetes cluster matches the configuration you’ve supplied in Git. It uses an operator in the cluster to trigger deployments inside Kubernetes, which means that you don’t need a separate continuous delivery tool.	It solves what developers are dreaming about: A system that allows developers to locally develop their code and their services with Docker and run the exact same system in production. The same Docker images, the same service configurations and the same code.
Describe the entire desired state of your system in Git. This includes apps, configuration, dashboards, monitoring, and everything else; Use YAML to enforce conformance to the declared system. You don’t need to run kubectl because all changes go through Git. Use diffing tools to detect divergence between observed and desired state and receive notifications; Everything is controlled through pull requests, which means no learning curve for new developers. Just use your standard PR process. Your Git history provides a sequence of transactions, allowing you to recover system state from any snapshot. Fix a production issue via pull request rather than making changes to the running system	Docker;CI/CD;Kubernetes;Containers
Statistics
GitHub Stars 6.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 81	Stacks 6
Followers 76	Followers 7
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Open Source	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git Kubernetes YAML	Docker Laravel New Relic Python WordPress PHP Jenkins Magento Drupal Travis CI

What are some alternatives to Flux CD, Lagoon?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Flux CD vs Lagoon: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Flux CD and Lagoon, it is important to understand the key differences between these two tools for managing Kubernetes applications and infrastructure.

Architecture: Flux CD follows a GitOps approach where the desired state of the cluster is defined in Git, allowing for a declarative infrastructure management. In contrast, Lagoon is a container-based platform that focuses on managing and deploying containerized applications on Kubernetes clusters, without requiring Git as the source of truth.
Scope of Functionality: Flux CD primarily focuses on continuous delivery and automation of deployments, allowing users to easily automate the process of deploying new versions of applications. On the other hand, Lagoon provides a comprehensive platform for managing the entire lifecycle of containerized applications from development to deployment, including build, test, and deployment processes.
Integration with CI/CD Tools: Flux CD integrates well with various CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins and GitLab CI, to automate the deployment process based on changes in the Git repository. Lagoon, however, includes its own CI system that is tightly integrated with the platform, providing a seamless experience for developers to build, test, and deploy their applications.
Deployment Flexibility: Flux CD offers flexibility in terms of deployment strategies, supporting strategies such as canary deployments and blue-green deployments to ensure zero downtime during updates. Lagoon, on the other hand, provides a standardized deployment workflow that simplifies the process of deploying applications without the need for advanced deployment strategies.
Community Support: Flux CD is maintained by the Flux project community, which provides regular updates, bug fixes, and new features to ensure the tool remains up-to-date and reliable. Lagoon, on the other hand, is supported by the amazee.io community, offering dedicated support and resources for users to troubleshoot issues and access documentation.
Scalability and Extensibility: Flux CD is designed to be highly scalable and extensible, allowing users to customize and extend its functionality through the use of custom controllers and operators. In comparison, Lagoon offers a more opinionated approach to managing containerized applications, focusing on simplicity and ease of use rather than extensibility and customization.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Flux CD and Lagoon is essential for choosing the right tool for managing Kubernetes applications and infrastructure.