StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Formik vs Material-UI

Formik vs Material-UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
Formik
Formik
Stacks713
Followers206
Votes0
GitHub Stars34.3K
Forks2.8K

Formik vs Material-UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Formik and Material-UI are two popular libraries used in web development. Formik is a form library for React that simplifies the process of building forms and managing form state. Material-UI, on the other hand, is a set of components that implement the Material Design guidelines for React applications. While both libraries are used in web development, they have some key differences.

  1. Standalone vs Component-based: Formik is a standalone library that focuses on form handling and state management. It provides a higher-order component (HOC) that wraps form components and handles form state. Material-UI, on the other hand, is a component library that provides a set of pre-designed components for building UIs following the Material Design guidelines. It includes form components that can be used alongside Formik to build forms.

  2. Form state management: Formik provides a streamlined way to manage form state by automatically handling form submission, validation, errors, and values. It manages form state internally and provides APIs to access and manipulate the form state. Material-UI, on the other hand, does not directly handle form state management. It focuses on providing UI components and styling. To manage form state with Material-UI, you can integrate it with Formik or use another state management solution like React hooks or Redux.

  3. Customization and Styling: Material-UI provides a wide range of pre-designed components with customizable styles and themes. It follows the Material Design guidelines and provides a consistent and visually appealing UI out-of-the-box. Formik, on the other hand, focuses on form handling and does not provide pre-designed UI components. However, it can be used alongside Material-UI to build custom forms with the desired styling.

  4. Validation: Formik provides built-in validation support with its validation schema and validation function. It allows you to define validation rules for each field and automatically handles validation errors. Material-UI does not provide validation functionality out-of-the-box. You need to implement your own validation logic or use a separate validation library when using Material-UI for forms.

  5. Form submission: Formik provides a streamlined way to handle form submission with its handleSubmit function. It automatically handles form submission and prevents default form behavior. Material-UI does not provide form submission functionality out-of-the-box. You need to implement your own form submission logic using event handlers or integrate Material-UI forms with Formik or other form handling solutions.

  6. Formik-specific features: Formik provides additional features like field array support, form reset, form initialization, form synchronization, and more. It has a rich set of APIs and utilities to handle complex form scenarios. Material-UI does not have these Formik-specific features built-in. If you require these features, you would need to integrate Material-UI forms with Formik or implement them separately.

In summary, Formik is a standalone form library that provides form state management, validation, and submission functionality. Material-UI, on the other hand, is a component library that focuses on providing pre-designed UI components following the Material Design guidelines. While both libraries can be used together, Formik offers more extensive form handling features compared to Material-UI.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Formik

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
Formik
Formik

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

It takes care of the repetitive and annoying stuff--keeping track of values/errors/visited fields, orchestrating validation, and handling submission--so you don't have to.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Getting values in and out of form state;Validation and error messages;Handling form submission
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
34.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.8K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
713
Followers
3.7K
Followers
206
Votes
445
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
React
React
HTML5
HTML5
TypeScript
TypeScript
React Native
React Native

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Formik?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase