Framer vs InVision: What are the differences?

Introduction

Framer and InVision are both popular prototyping tools used in the design industry. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart from each other. In this article, we will explore these differences and highlight the unique features of each platform.

1. Interactive Design Capabilities: Framer is known for its powerful coding capabilities, allowing designers to create highly interactive and dynamic prototypes using JavaScript. InVision, on the other hand, offers a more visual and intuitive approach to prototyping, focusing on creating clickable mockups without the need for coding skills.

2. Collaboration Features: InVision excels in collaboration features, offering tools for real-time collaboration, user testing, and feedback collection. It allows multiple team members to work on a project simultaneously and provides features for version control and design handoff. Framer, on the other hand, has a more individual-focused workflow with limited collaboration features.

3. Animation and Microinteractions: Framer provides extensive control over animation and microinteractions, allowing designers to create complex and custom animations with ease. It supports advanced animations like spring physics and allows precise timing control. InVision, although it offers basic animation capabilities, is more focused on creating simple transitions and interactions.

4. Design Component Libraries: InVision provides a vast library of ready-to-use design components and UI kits, making it easier for designers to build consistent and cohesive designs. It offers a wide range of pre-built elements, such as buttons, icons, and navigation menus. Framer, on the other hand, does not have a built-in component library and requires designers to create their own components from scratch.

5. Code Handoff and Developer Handover: Framer allows designers to easily translate their design prototypes into production-ready code, making it easier for developers to implement the design. It offers features like code snippets and CSS exporting. InVision, while it doesn't provide direct code generation, has features like Inspect that allow developers to access design specifications, assets, and measurements, facilitating a smoother handover process.

6. Platform Compatibility: Framer is more focused on native app development, providing support for platforms like iOS, Android, and React Native. It offers features like device preview and testing on real devices. InVision, on the other hand, is platform-agnostic and can be used to create prototypes for web, mobile, and desktop applications.

In summary, Framer excels in interactive design capabilities, animation control, and code handoff, while InVision shines in collaboration features, design component libraries, and platform compatibility. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project and the skillset of the design team.