StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs Git-appraise

Gerrit Code Review vs Git-appraise

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Git-appraise
Git-appraise
Stacks4
Followers27
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks143
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Git-appraise: What are the differences?

Introduction: In software development, there are several tools available for code review processes such as Gerrit Code Review and Git-appraise. Both tools serve the purpose of facilitating code reviews within a development team.

  1. Integration with Git hosting services: Gerrit Code Review is tightly integrated with Git, while Git-appraise can work with any Git hosting service like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket. This allows for more flexibility in the choice of Git hosting platform.

  2. Code review workflow: Gerrit Code Review follows a more structured workflow with features such as code review labels, change sets, and integrations with CI/CD tools, providing a comprehensive code review process. On the other hand, Git-appraise is more lightweight, simplifying the code review process without the need for additional features, making it easier to adopt.

  3. Community support and adoption: Gerrit Code Review has been widely adopted in larger organizations and open-source projects due to its robust features and support. Git-appraise, being a simpler tool, is more commonly used in smaller teams or projects looking for a more lightweight code review solution.

  4. User interface and user experience: Gerrit Code Review offers a web-based user interface for code reviews, providing more functionality but potentially requiring a learning curve for new users. Git-appraise, on the other hand, integrates seamlessly with Git tools like the command line interface, keeping the review process close to the Git workflow and familiar for users.

  5. Customization and extensibility: Gerrit Code Review allows for extensive customization through plugins and hooks, enabling teams to tailor the code review process to their specific requirements. Git-appraise, while lacking in extensive customization options, offers a simpler and more straightforward setup for teams looking for a quick and easy code review solution.

  6. Scalability and performance: Gerrit Code Review is known for its ability to handle large code bases and high volume of code reviews efficiently, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-scale projects. Git-appraise, being a lightweight tool, may not offer the same level of scalability and performance for larger projects.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review and Git-appraise differ in integration with Git hosting services, code review workflow, community support, user interface, customization, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Git-appraise
Git-appraise
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

This is a distributed code review system for Git. Code reviews are stored inside the repository as git objects that can be pushed and pulled to remote repos. When pulling, updates from the remote are automatically merged by the tool.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Code review requests; Continuous integration status; Robot comments (generated by static analysis tool); Review comments (generated by person)
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
143
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
4
Stacks
116
Followers
27
Followers
223
Votes
0
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
Git
Git
Jenkins
Jenkins
Eclipse
Eclipse
GitHub
GitHub
Phabricator
Phabricator
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Git-appraise, Gerrit Code Review?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana