Ghost Inspector vs Selenium

Overview

Ghost Inspector

Stacks64

Followers117

Votes22

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

Ghost Inspector vs Selenium: What are the differences?

What is Ghost Inspector? Automated website testing. Record yourself browsing once. Replay it continuously from the cloud. Ghost Inspector lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

What is Selenium? Web Browser Automation. Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Ghost Inspector can be classified as a tool in the "In-Browser Testing" category, while Selenium is grouped under "Browser Testing".

"Simple test editor" is the primary reason why developers consider Ghost Inspector over the competitors, whereas "Automates browsers" was stated as the key factor in picking Selenium.

Selenium is an open source tool with 14.7K GitHub stars and 4.92K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Selenium's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ghost Inspector, Selenium

Benjamin

QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital

Jul 1, 2019

Needs adviceon

Nightwatchjs

Selenium

JavaScript

For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few:

@{Nightwatchjs}|tool:4125|
@{Selenium}|tool:1517|
@{Cucumber}|tool:2544|
@{GitHub}|tool:27|
@{Go.CD}|tool:2349|
@{Docker}|tool:586|
@{ExpressJS}|tool:1163|
@{React}|tool:1020|
@{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028|

With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

2.25M views2.25M

Comments

Kevin

QA Engineer Freelance at happn

Aug 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

WebdriverIO

Appium

Selenium

I chose WebdriverIO and Appium to implement a E2E tests solution on a native mobile app. WebdriverIO goes well beyond just implementing the Selenium / Appium protocol and allows to run tests in parallel out of the box. Appium has the big advantage of supporting iOS and Android platforms, so the test codebase and tools are exactly the same, which greatly reduces the learning curve and implementation time.

1.17M views1.17M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector	Selenium
It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.	Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 33.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 8.6K
Stacks 64	Stacks 16.2K
Followers 117	Followers 12.6K
Votes 22	Votes 527
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 No code required 3 Runscope integration 3 Simple test editor 2 Videos of every test run 2 Screenshot comparison Cons 1 Support Cross-device testing (device, web) 0 Flash Support inside browser 0 Load & Performance testing	Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers
Integrations
PagerDuty Runscope GitHub Heroku CircleCI Travis CI AWS CodePipeline Jenkins Slack HipChat	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, Selenium?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Ghost Inspector vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Ghost Inspector can be classified as a tool in the "In-Browser Testing" category, while Selenium is grouped under "Browser Testing".

"Simple test editor" is the primary reason why developers consider Ghost Inspector over the competitors, whereas "Automates browsers" was stated as the key factor in picking Selenium.

Selenium is an open source tool with 14.7K GitHub stars and 4.92K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Selenium's open source repository on GitHub.