GitBucket vs JFrog Artifactory

Overview

GitBucket

Stacks79

Followers177

Votes36

JFrog Artifactory

Stacks342

Followers374

Votes0

GitBucket vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing GitBucket and JFrog Artifactory, there are several key differences that differentiate the two platforms in terms of their features, functionality, and use cases.

Version Control System vs Binary Repository Manager: GitBucket primarily functions as a version control system, allowing users to manage and track changes in source code, while JFrog Artifactory is a binary repository manager designed to store and manage binary artifacts such as libraries, dependencies, and docker images.
Code Collaboration vs Artifact Management: GitBucket focuses on facilitating code collaboration among developers through features like pull requests, code reviews, and branching strategies, whereas JFrog Artifactory aids in artifact management by providing a centralized location for storing, versioning, and sharing binary artifacts across development teams.
Git-based vs Artifact-based Operations: GitBucket operates on a Git-based system where code changes are tracked and managed through commits, branches, and merges, while JFrog Artifactory operates on an artifact-based system where binary artifacts are stored, retrieved, and deployed within a software development environment.
Open-source vs Commercial Software: GitBucket is an open-source platform that is freely available for users to download, install, and customize according to their requirements, while JFrog Artifactory is a commercial software solution that offers additional features, support, and services for enterprise users.
Continuous Integration vs Artifact Lifecycle Management: While GitBucket integrates with various continuous integration tools for building and testing code changes, JFrog Artifactory focuses on managing the entire artifact lifecycle from deployment to distribution, ensuring the reliability and security of binary artifacts throughout the development process.
Developer-centric vs DevOps-oriented Platform: GitBucket caters more towards developers by providing tools and features for code collaboration and version control, whereas JFrog Artifactory is more oriented towards DevOps teams by offering solutions for artifact management, automation, and integration with CI/CD pipelines.

In Summary, GitBucket and JFrog Artifactory differ in their core functionalities, with GitBucket focusing on version control and code collaboration, while JFrog Artifactory specializes in artifact management and DevOps automation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitBucket, JFrog Artifactory

tutulbuet

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

GitHub

JFrog Artifactory

Whenever Qualys scan finds out software vulnerability, say for example Java SDK or any software version that has a potential vulnerability, we search the web to find out the solution and usually install a later version or patch downloading from the web. The problem is, as we are downloading it from web and there are a number of servers where we patch and as an ultimate outcome different people downloads different version and so forth. So I want to create a repository for such binaries so that we use the same patch for all servers.

When I was thinking about the repo, obviously first thought came as GitHub.. But then I realized, it is for code version control and collaboration, not for the packaged software. The other option I am thinking is JFrog Artifactory which stores the binaries and the package software.

What is your recommendation?

258k views258k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitBucket	JFrog Artifactory
GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.	It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.
Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access);Repository viewer and online file editing;Repository search (Code and Issues);Wiki;Issues;Fork / Pull request;Mail notification;Activity timeline;User management (for Administrators);Group (like Organization in Github);LDAP integration;Gravatar support	-
Statistics
Stacks 79	Stacks 342
Followers 177	Followers 374
Votes 36	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Self hosted 7 Open source 6 Familiar interface 5 Scala 5 Simple setup	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Debian npm

What are some alternatives to GitBucket, JFrog Artifactory?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

GitBucket vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing GitBucket and JFrog Artifactory, there are several key differences that differentiate the two platforms in terms of their features, functionality, and use cases.

Version Control System vs Binary Repository Manager: GitBucket primarily functions as a version control system, allowing users to manage and track changes in source code, while JFrog Artifactory is a binary repository manager designed to store and manage binary artifacts such as libraries, dependencies, and docker images.
Code Collaboration vs Artifact Management: GitBucket focuses on facilitating code collaboration among developers through features like pull requests, code reviews, and branching strategies, whereas JFrog Artifactory aids in artifact management by providing a centralized location for storing, versioning, and sharing binary artifacts across development teams.
Git-based vs Artifact-based Operations: GitBucket operates on a Git-based system where code changes are tracked and managed through commits, branches, and merges, while JFrog Artifactory operates on an artifact-based system where binary artifacts are stored, retrieved, and deployed within a software development environment.
Open-source vs Commercial Software: GitBucket is an open-source platform that is freely available for users to download, install, and customize according to their requirements, while JFrog Artifactory is a commercial software solution that offers additional features, support, and services for enterprise users.
Continuous Integration vs Artifact Lifecycle Management: While GitBucket integrates with various continuous integration tools for building and testing code changes, JFrog Artifactory focuses on managing the entire artifact lifecycle from deployment to distribution, ensuring the reliability and security of binary artifacts throughout the development process.
Developer-centric vs DevOps-oriented Platform: GitBucket caters more towards developers by providing tools and features for code collaboration and version control, whereas JFrog Artifactory is more oriented towards DevOps teams by offering solutions for artifact management, automation, and integration with CI/CD pipelines.

GitBucket vs JFrog Artifactory

Overview

GitBucket vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?