StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub Enterprise vs Gitea

GitHub Enterprise vs Gitea

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10
Gitea
Gitea
Stacks322
Followers448
Votes123
GitHub Stars51.8K
Forks6.2K

GitHub Enterprise vs Gitea: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitHub Enterprise and Gitea are both version control systems that allow teams to collaborate on code. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Scalability: GitHub Enterprise is designed for enterprise-level organizations with larger teams and complex workflows. It offers advanced features and can handle a high volume of users and repositories. On the other hand, Gitea is lightweight and more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers.

  2. Cost: GitHub Enterprise is a commercial product and requires a license to use. The pricing depends on the number of users and repositories, and it can be expensive for larger organizations. Gitea, on the other hand, is open source and completely free to use. This makes it a more cost-effective option for small teams or businesses with budget constraints.

  3. Customizability: GitHub Enterprise provides extensive customization options, allowing organizations to tailor it to their specific needs. It offers integration with various third-party tools and services, such as project management or continuous integration tools. Gitea, while also customizable, has fewer integrations available and may not offer the same level of flexibility.

  4. Security: GitHub Enterprise offers advanced security features, including enterprise-level authentication and access controls. It also provides security auditing and monitoring tools to ensure the safety of sensitive code. Gitea, while having some security features, may not be as robust in comparison, especially for organizations with stricter security requirements.

  5. Support and Documentation: GitHub Enterprise offers comprehensive support and documentation, including access to GitHub's extensive knowledge base and community forums. It also provides enterprise-level support for customers. Gitea, being an open-source project, may have limited official support options. However, there is an active community that can provide assistance and guidance.

  6. Platform Compatibility: GitHub Enterprise is compatible with various platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It also integrates well with other GitHub services and tools. Gitea, while also compatible with multiple platforms, may have less extensive integration options and may require additional configuration for certain platforms.

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise is a scalable and customizable solution suitable for large organizations with more complex needs and budgets, while Gitea is a lightweight and cost-effective option for smaller teams or individual developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub Enterprise, Gitea

Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k
Comments
Eric
Eric

DevOps at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceonBitbucketBitbucketCrucibleCrucibleConfluenceConfluence

We are using a Bitbucket server, and due to migration efforts and new Atlassian community license changes, we need to move to a new self-hosted solution. The new data-center license for Atlassian, available in February, will be community provisioned (free). Along with that community license, other technologies will be coming with it (Crucible, Confluence, and Jira). Is there value in a paid-for license to get the GitHub Enterprise? Are the tools that come with it worth the cost?

I know it is about $20 per 10 seats, and we have about 300 users. Have other convertees to Microsoft's tools found it easy to do a migration? Is the toolset that much more beneficial to the free suite that one can get from Atlassian?

So far, free seems to be the winner, and the familiarization with Atlassian implementation and maintenance is understood. Going to GitHub, are there any distinct challenges to be found or any perks to be attained?

549k views549k
Comments
Darius
Darius

Dec 19, 2020

Review

These are pretty competitive, and to recommend one over the other would require understanding your usage. Also, what other tools you use: for instance, what do you use for Issue-tracking, or for build pipelines. In your case, since you are already using Bitbucket, the question would be: do you have any current pain-points? And, on the other hand, do you already use Atlassian's JIRA, where you'd benefit from the tight integration? So, though I would not recommend one over the other just in general,. But, if Bitbucket fulfills your current use-cases, then there seems to be little motivation to move.

317k views317k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Gitea
Gitea

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
51.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
500
Stacks
322
Followers
627
Followers
448
Votes
10
Votes
123
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    Code security
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Pros
  • 24
    Self-hosted
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 15
    Free
  • 12
    Simple
  • 9
    Easy Setup
Cons
  • 3
    Community-fork of Gogs
  • 0
    Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
No integrations available
Raspberry Pi
Raspberry Pi
DingTalk
DingTalk
Discord
Discord
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Vagrant
Vagrant
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to GitHub Enterprise, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana