Gitea vs Go.CD

Overview

GoCD

Stacks205

Followers325

Votes207

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks980

Gitea

Stacks323

Followers448

Votes123

GitHub Stars51.8K

Forks6.2K

Gitea vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Gitea and Go.CD

1. **Version Control System**: Gitea is a self-hosted Git service and a lightweight code hosting solution that allows users to have full control over their repositories, while Go.CD is an open-source tool for continuous delivery that focuses on automating the deployment of code changes.
   
2. **License**: Gitea is licensed under the MIT License, meaning it is open source and free to use, modify, and distribute, while Go.CD is licensed under the Apache License 2.0, which also allows for open-source use but has different terms and conditions.
   
3. **Deployment Approach**: Gitea is primarily used for managing and hosting code repositories, offering features like pull requests, issues tracking, and a built-in wiki, whereas Go.CD is designed specifically for continuous delivery and integration, enabling automation of the entire software release process.
   
4. **User Interface**: Gitea has a user-friendly and intuitive interface that is easy to navigate and use, making it suitable for developers of all levels, while Go.CD provides a more complex interface with a focus on pipeline configuration and monitoring for continuous integration and deployment.
   
5. **Extensibility**: Gitea allows users to extend its capabilities through plugins and integrations with other tools and services, providing flexibility in customizing the platform to meet specific requirements, whereas Go.CD offers a more limited range of built-in integrations and extensions, which may require additional development effort for customization.
   
6. **Community Support**: Gitea has a robust community of contributors and users who actively support and enhance the platform with new features and improvements, creating a vibrant open-source ecosystem, while Go.CD also has a community backing but may not be as extensive or active in comparison to Gitea.

In Summary, The key differences between Gitea and Go.CD lie in their focus on version control vs. continuous delivery, licensing terms, deployment approach, user interface, extensibility, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GoCD, Gitea

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k

Comments

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Docker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GoCD	Gitea
GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.	Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.
Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.3K	GitHub Stars 51.8K
GitHub Forks 980	GitHub Forks 6.2K
Stacks 205	Stacks 323
Followers 325	Followers 448
Votes 207	Votes 123
Pros & Cons
Pros 32 Open source 27 Pipeline dependencies 25 Pipeline structures 22 Can run jobs in parallel 20 Very flexible Cons 2 Horrible ui 2 Lack of plugins 1 No support	Pros 24 Self-hosted 16 Lightweight 15 Free 12 Simple 9 Multiple code maintainers Cons 3 Community-fork of Gogs 0 Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
Docker Kubernetes Slack	Raspberry Pi DingTalk Discord OpenLDAP Drone.io Jenkins Vagrant MySQL SQLite PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to GoCD, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Gitea vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Gitea and Go.CD

1. **Version Control System**: Gitea is a self-hosted Git service and a lightweight code hosting solution that allows users to have full control over their repositories, while Go.CD is an open-source tool for continuous delivery that focuses on automating the deployment of code changes.
   
2. **License**: Gitea is licensed under the MIT License, meaning it is open source and free to use, modify, and distribute, while Go.CD is licensed under the Apache License 2.0, which also allows for open-source use but has different terms and conditions.
   
3. **Deployment Approach**: Gitea is primarily used for managing and hosting code repositories, offering features like pull requests, issues tracking, and a built-in wiki, whereas Go.CD is designed specifically for continuous delivery and integration, enabling automation of the entire software release process.
   
4. **User Interface**: Gitea has a user-friendly and intuitive interface that is easy to navigate and use, making it suitable for developers of all levels, while Go.CD provides a more complex interface with a focus on pipeline configuration and monitoring for continuous integration and deployment.
   
5. **Extensibility**: Gitea allows users to extend its capabilities through plugins and integrations with other tools and services, providing flexibility in customizing the platform to meet specific requirements, whereas Go.CD offers a more limited range of built-in integrations and extensions, which may require additional development effort for customization.
   
6. **Community Support**: Gitea has a robust community of contributors and users who actively support and enhance the platform with new features and improvements, creating a vibrant open-source ecosystem, while Go.CD also has a community backing but may not be as extensive or active in comparison to Gitea.

Gitea vs Go.CD

Overview