Gitea vs OneDev

Overview

Gitea

Stacks322

Followers448

Votes123

GitHub Stars51.8K

Forks6.2K

OneDev

Stacks8

Followers30

Votes3

GitHub Stars14.4K

Forks920

Gitea vs OneDev: What are the differences?

Differences Between Gitea and OneDev

Gitea and OneDev are two popular software solutions used for hosting and managing Git repositories. While both provide similar functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart.

User Interface: Gitea offers a clean and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to navigate through repositories and perform actions. On the other hand, OneDev provides a more comprehensive and feature-rich interface, with advanced options for managing repositories and projects.
Integration Capabilities: Gitea offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools and services, allowing seamless collaboration and automation with external systems. OneDev, on the other hand, has limited integration options, which may affect the overall workflow and productivity for users requiring extensive integrations.
Permission Management: Gitea provides a flexible permission management system, allowing administrators to control access rights at various levels, such as repositories, teams, and organizations. OneDev also offers a similar permission management feature, but with less granularity and customization options compared to Gitea.
Built-in CI/CD: OneDev has a strong focus on Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) and provides built-in capabilities for automating build, test, and deployment processes. Gitea, on the other hand, does not have native support for CI/CD and requires integration with other tools or services for achieving similar functionalities.
Issue Tracking: Gitea provides a basic issue tracking feature that allows users to create and manage issues associated with repositories. OneDev, however, offers a more advanced and customizable issue tracking system with features like custom fields, workflows, and issue dependency management.
Extensibility: Gitea offers a range of plugins and extensions that users can leverage to extend the functionality of the platform. OneDev, on the other hand, has a more closed architecture and does not provide as many options for customizing or extending the platform.

In summary, Gitea offers a user-friendly interface, strong integration capabilities, and flexibility in permission management, while OneDev focuses on advanced features like built-in CI/CD, customizable issue tracking, and extensibility options. The choice between Gitea and OneDev depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Gitea, OneDev

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gitea	OneDev
Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.	It is a super easy all-in-one DevOps platform. With Issue Tracking, Git Management, Pull Request, and Build Farm. Simple yet Powerful.
-	Docker First Kubernetes Native Build Farm; Create Build Spec in a Breeze; Flexible Build Workflow and Pipeline; Custom Issue States and Fields; Auto-Refreshing Issue Boards; Symbol Search and Navigation
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.8K	GitHub Stars 14.4K
GitHub Forks 6.2K	GitHub Forks 920
Stacks 322	Stacks 8
Followers 448	Followers 30
Votes 123	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 24 Self-hosted 16 Lightweight 15 Free 12 Simple 9 Multiple code maintainers Cons 3 Community-fork of Gogs 0 Easy Windows authentication is not supported	Pros 1 Free 1 Self-hosted 1 Integrated CI/CD
Integrations
Raspberry Pi DingTalk Discord OpenLDAP Drone.io Jenkins Vagrant MySQL SQLite PostgreSQL	C++ Java Less JavaScript Golang PHP Kubernetes C# Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to Gitea, OneDev?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

Gitea vs OneDev: What are the differences?

Differences Between Gitea and OneDev

Gitea and OneDev are two popular software solutions used for hosting and managing Git repositories. While both provide similar functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart.

User Interface: Gitea offers a clean and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to navigate through repositories and perform actions. On the other hand, OneDev provides a more comprehensive and feature-rich interface, with advanced options for managing repositories and projects.
Integration Capabilities: Gitea offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools and services, allowing seamless collaboration and automation with external systems. OneDev, on the other hand, has limited integration options, which may affect the overall workflow and productivity for users requiring extensive integrations.
Permission Management: Gitea provides a flexible permission management system, allowing administrators to control access rights at various levels, such as repositories, teams, and organizations. OneDev also offers a similar permission management feature, but with less granularity and customization options compared to Gitea.
Built-in CI/CD: OneDev has a strong focus on Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) and provides built-in capabilities for automating build, test, and deployment processes. Gitea, on the other hand, does not have native support for CI/CD and requires integration with other tools or services for achieving similar functionalities.
Issue Tracking: Gitea provides a basic issue tracking feature that allows users to create and manage issues associated with repositories. OneDev, however, offers a more advanced and customizable issue tracking system with features like custom fields, workflows, and issue dependency management.
Extensibility: Gitea offers a range of plugins and extensions that users can leverage to extend the functionality of the platform. OneDev, on the other hand, has a more closed architecture and does not provide as many options for customizing or extending the platform.

Gitea vs OneDev

Overview

Gitea vs OneDev: What are the differences?