StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

Β© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Gitea vs Upsource

Gitea vs Upsource

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Upsource
Upsource
Stacks51
Followers77
Votes58
Gitea
Gitea
Stacks322
Followers448
Votes123
GitHub Stars51.8K
Forks6.2K

Gitea vs Upsource: What are the differences?

Introduction: Gitea and Upsource are both tools used for managing Git repositories, but they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Collaboration Features: Gitea offers a wide range of collaboration features such as issue tracking, pull requests, and code reviews, making it easy for team members to work together efficiently. On the other hand, Upsource focuses more on code review and code intelligence, providing advanced analysis and insights into the codebase.

  2. User Interface: Gitea has a straightforward and user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate, making it suitable for beginners. In contrast, Upsource has a more sophisticated interface with powerful search and filtering capabilities, catering to more experienced users who require in-depth code analysis tools.

  3. Scalability: Gitea is known for its lightweight and scalable architecture, making it ideal for small to medium-sized teams with simple requirements. In comparison, Upsource is better suited for larger teams or organizations with complex codebases, thanks to its advanced features and scalability options.

  4. Integration: Gitea offers integration with various services and tools such as Jenkins, Slack, and Docker, allowing for seamless workflow automation. Upsource, on the other hand, provides deep integration with JetBrains IDEs, enhancing the development experience for users who rely on these tools.

  5. License: Gitea is an open-source project released under the MIT License, giving users the freedom to modify and distribute the software as they see fit. In contrast, Upsource is a commercial product from JetBrains, requiring a paid license for extended usage and premium support options.

In Summary, Gitea is a lightweight and user-friendly tool with a strong focus on collaboration, while Upsource offers advanced code analysis features and integration with JetBrains IDEs, making it suitable for larger teams and complex codebases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Upsource, Gitea

Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Upsource
Upsource
Gitea
Gitea

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Instantly access all your projects;Keep track of code changes;Use code insight in Java projects;Explore any revision of your code base;Discuss and review code;Share links to code
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
51.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
51
Stacks
322
Followers
77
Followers
448
Votes
58
Votes
123
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Free for 10 users
  • 12
    Good code review
  • 8
    IDE integration
  • 8
    Java code inspections and navigation
  • 3
    Has a linux version
Cons
  • 3
    Very Large Server Footprint. Very large
Pros
  • 24
    Self-hosted
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 15
    Free
  • 12
    Simple
  • 9
    Multiple code maintainers
Cons
  • 3
    Community-fork of Gogs
  • 0
    Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Perforce
Perforce
Raspberry Pi
Raspberry Pi
DingTalk
DingTalk
Discord
Discord
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Vagrant
Vagrant
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Upsource, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana