Github Actions vs ProofHub

Overview

ProofHub

Stacks10

Followers16

Votes5

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

Github Actions vs ProofHub: What are the differences?

Integration with Third-party Services: GitHub Actions allows seamless integration with various third-party services and tools, such as Slack, AWS, and Microsoft Azure, enabling automation and customization of workflows. In contrast, ProofHub offers limited third-party integrations, focusing primarily on project management functionalities within its own platform.
Version Control vs. Project Management: GitHub Actions primarily focuses on version control and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes, allowing developers to automate tasks related to code repositories. On the other hand, ProofHub is a project management tool that caters to tasks such as task assignment, project planning, and collaboration, with less emphasis on version control.
Community Support and Resources: GitHub Actions benefits from a large and active community of developers, providing a vast library of pre-built workflows, action templates, and community support. In contrast, ProofHub offers comprehensive support resources directly from their platform but may lack the extensive community-driven resources available in GitHub Actions.
Target Audience: GitHub Actions is primarily targeted towards software developers and IT professionals who require version control, automation, and CI/CD capabilities in their development workflows. In comparison, ProofHub is geared towards project managers, teams, and businesses looking for a centralized platform to manage projects, communication, and collaboration.
Customization and Extensibility: GitHub Actions offers a high level of customization and extensibility through the creation of custom workflows, actions, and integrations, enabling users to tailor automation processes to their specific needs. In contrast, ProofHub provides a more structured and predefined set of features and functions, limiting the extent of customization available to users.
Cost Structure: GitHub Actions offers a flexible pricing structure, with free tier options for public repositories and scalable pricing based on usage and resources for private repositories. ProofHub, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based model with tiered pricing plans based on the number of users and features required.

In Summary, GitHub Actions and ProofHub differ in their focus on version control vs. project management, third-party integrations, community support, target audience, customization options, and cost structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on ProofHub, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

ProofHub	GitHub Actions
ProofHub puts everything you need to get work done in one place. It is a project management software that takes care of your privacy, security, customization, and workability needs.	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
Task management; Time tracking; Gantt charts; Reports; File sharing; Calendar; Live chat; File proofing; Project management; Notes; Custom roles; Discussions; Project templates; In app notifications; Announcements; @mention; Workflow	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 10	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 16	Followers 3.1K
Votes 5	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Simple, easy to understand 1 No per-user fee 1 Has all the tools you need under one roo 1 Little to no learning curve 1 Mobile friendly	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Read actions in Marketplace Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No Deployment Projects
Integrations
Google Drive Box OneDrive Freshbooks	GitHub

What are some alternatives to ProofHub, GitHub Actions?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Github Actions vs ProofHub: What are the differences?

Integration with Third-party Services: GitHub Actions allows seamless integration with various third-party services and tools, such as Slack, AWS, and Microsoft Azure, enabling automation and customization of workflows. In contrast, ProofHub offers limited third-party integrations, focusing primarily on project management functionalities within its own platform.
Version Control vs. Project Management: GitHub Actions primarily focuses on version control and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes, allowing developers to automate tasks related to code repositories. On the other hand, ProofHub is a project management tool that caters to tasks such as task assignment, project planning, and collaboration, with less emphasis on version control.
Community Support and Resources: GitHub Actions benefits from a large and active community of developers, providing a vast library of pre-built workflows, action templates, and community support. In contrast, ProofHub offers comprehensive support resources directly from their platform but may lack the extensive community-driven resources available in GitHub Actions.
Target Audience: GitHub Actions is primarily targeted towards software developers and IT professionals who require version control, automation, and CI/CD capabilities in their development workflows. In comparison, ProofHub is geared towards project managers, teams, and businesses looking for a centralized platform to manage projects, communication, and collaboration.
Customization and Extensibility: GitHub Actions offers a high level of customization and extensibility through the creation of custom workflows, actions, and integrations, enabling users to tailor automation processes to their specific needs. In contrast, ProofHub provides a more structured and predefined set of features and functions, limiting the extent of customization available to users.
Cost Structure: GitHub Actions offers a flexible pricing structure, with free tier options for public repositories and scalable pricing based on usage and resources for private repositories. ProofHub, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based model with tiered pricing plans based on the number of users and features required.

Github Actions vs ProofHub

Overview