StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs Glitch

GitHub vs Glitch

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Glitch
Glitch
Stacks87
Followers179
Votes42

GitHub vs Glitch: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitHub and Glitch

GitHub and Glitch are both popular platforms used for collaborating on coding projects, but they have some key differences that set them apart. Here are six significant differences between GitHub and Glitch:

  1. Hosting Approach: GitHub is primarily used for hosting and version control of git repositories, providing a platform for developers to collaboratively work on and manage code. On the other hand, Glitch focuses on providing an online coding environment where users can create and host their web applications, allowing real-time collaboration and immediate deployment without needing to worry about infrastructure setup.

  2. Project Scope: GitHub is more suitable for larger and complex projects that require detailed version control, documentation, and collaboration across a team or even a global community. It allows for branching, merging, and managing multiple contributors effectively. Glitch, on the other hand, is designed for smaller-scale projects and experimentation, where individuals or small teams can quickly prototype, experiment with, and showcase their web application ideas.

  3. Code Organization: GitHub organizes code repositories based on git workflows, allowing users to create branches, manage issues, and track changes effectively. It provides a comprehensive project management system with features like pull requests and code reviews. Glitch, however, provides a more intuitive and simplified approach by organizing projects as individual apps where all the code, assets, and configuration files are stored in a single place, making it easier to manage and share projects.

  4. Learning Resources: GitHub is rich in learning resources and documentation, making it an excellent platform for developers to collaborate, learn from others, and contribute to open-source projects. It offers a wide range of project repositories and code examples. Glitch, on the other hand, focuses more on the educational aspect and provides a wide range of beginner-friendly projects, tutorials, and challenges. It aims to help learners quickly get started with coding and web development.

  5. Deployment Options: GitHub offers various deployment options, ranging from hosting static websites using GitHub Pages to integrating with cloud platforms like Heroku or deploying to cloud services like AWS or Azure. Glitch, on the other hand, provides a seamless deployment experience where apps are instantly hosted on Glitch's own infrastructure by default. It simplifies the deployment process and allows users to make their projects accessible online with just a few clicks.

  6. Community and Social Features: GitHub is known for its vast developer community, making it a hub for open-source collaboration and contributing to the global programming community. It provides features like issue tracking, project boards, and social interactions with other developers. Glitch, although smaller in scale, aims to build a community where users can share their projects, collaborate, and get feedback. It emphasizes social interaction and encourages users to discover and remix projects created by others.

In summary, GitHub is a versatile platform for managing, collaborating, and version-controlling code repositories, suitable for larger coding projects and open-source contributions. Glitch, on the other hand, focuses on providing a simplified online coding environment for smaller-scale projects and beginner-friendly experimentation, with easy deployment and a social aspect for sharing and remixing projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Glitch

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Glitch
Glitch

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Combining automated deployment, instant hosting and collaborative editing, Gomix gets you straight to coding. The apps you create are instantly live, hosted by us, and always up to date with your latest changes. Build products, prototype ideas, and hack solutions to problems.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Show off your work with the web—effortlessly; Share code and solutions for anyone
Statistics
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
87
Followers
259.0K
Followers
179
Votes
10.4K
Votes
42
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 12
    Bang! App built
  • 9
    Instant APPification ;)
  • 7
    Auto commits
  • 4
    No no. limitation on free projects
  • 3
    Easy to use
Cons
  • 5
    UI could be better / cleaner
  • 2
    Limited Support/Diffficult to use Non-JS Languages
  • 1
    Automatically suspends proxies
  • 1
    Cannot delete project, only the source code is
  • 1
    Not good for big projects
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
DigitalOcean App Platform
DigitalOcean App Platform
Fastly
Fastly
SQLite
SQLite
React
React

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Glitch?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot