Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GitHub vs Glitch: What are the differences?
Key Differences between GitHub and Glitch
GitHub and Glitch are both popular platforms used for collaborating on coding projects, but they have some key differences that set them apart. Here are six significant differences between GitHub and Glitch:
Hosting Approach: GitHub is primarily used for hosting and version control of git repositories, providing a platform for developers to collaboratively work on and manage code. On the other hand, Glitch focuses on providing an online coding environment where users can create and host their web applications, allowing real-time collaboration and immediate deployment without needing to worry about infrastructure setup.
Project Scope: GitHub is more suitable for larger and complex projects that require detailed version control, documentation, and collaboration across a team or even a global community. It allows for branching, merging, and managing multiple contributors effectively. Glitch, on the other hand, is designed for smaller-scale projects and experimentation, where individuals or small teams can quickly prototype, experiment with, and showcase their web application ideas.
Code Organization: GitHub organizes code repositories based on git workflows, allowing users to create branches, manage issues, and track changes effectively. It provides a comprehensive project management system with features like pull requests and code reviews. Glitch, however, provides a more intuitive and simplified approach by organizing projects as individual apps where all the code, assets, and configuration files are stored in a single place, making it easier to manage and share projects.
Learning Resources: GitHub is rich in learning resources and documentation, making it an excellent platform for developers to collaborate, learn from others, and contribute to open-source projects. It offers a wide range of project repositories and code examples. Glitch, on the other hand, focuses more on the educational aspect and provides a wide range of beginner-friendly projects, tutorials, and challenges. It aims to help learners quickly get started with coding and web development.
Deployment Options: GitHub offers various deployment options, ranging from hosting static websites using GitHub Pages to integrating with cloud platforms like Heroku or deploying to cloud services like AWS or Azure. Glitch, on the other hand, provides a seamless deployment experience where apps are instantly hosted on Glitch's own infrastructure by default. It simplifies the deployment process and allows users to make their projects accessible online with just a few clicks.
Community and Social Features: GitHub is known for its vast developer community, making it a hub for open-source collaboration and contributing to the global programming community. It provides features like issue tracking, project boards, and social interactions with other developers. Glitch, although smaller in scale, aims to build a community where users can share their projects, collaborate, and get feedback. It emphasizes social interaction and encourages users to discover and remix projects created by others.
In summary, GitHub is a versatile platform for managing, collaborating, and version-controlling code repositories, suitable for larger coding projects and open-source contributions. Glitch, on the other hand, focuses on providing a simplified online coding environment for smaller-scale projects and beginner-friendly experimentation, with easy deployment and a social aspect for sharing and remixing projects.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.
SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.
As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i
is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.
Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!
At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.
Pros of GitHub
- Open source friendly1.8K
- Easy source control1.5K
- Nice UI1.3K
- Great for team collaboration1.1K
- Easy setup867
- Issue tracker504
- Great community487
- Remote team collaboration483
- Great way to share449
- Pull request and features planning442
- Just works147
- Integrated in many tools132
- Free Public Repos122
- Github Gists116
- Github pages113
- Easy to find repos83
- Open source62
- Easy to find projects60
- It's free60
- Network effect56
- Extensive API49
- Organizations43
- Branching42
- Developer Profiles34
- Git Powered Wikis32
- Great for collaboration30
- It's fun24
- Clean interface and good integrations23
- Community SDK involvement22
- Learn from others source code20
- Because: Git16
- It integrates directly with Azure14
- Standard in Open Source collab10
- Newsfeed10
- Fast8
- Beautiful user experience8
- It integrates directly with Hipchat8
- Easy to discover new code libraries7
- Smooth integration6
- Integrations6
- Graphs6
- Nice API6
- It's awesome6
- Cloud SCM6
- Quick Onboarding5
- Remarkable uptime5
- CI Integration5
- Reliable5
- Hands down best online Git service available5
- Version Control4
- Unlimited Public Repos at no cost4
- Simple but powerful4
- Loved by developers4
- Free HTML hosting4
- Uses GIT4
- Security options4
- Easy to use and collaborate with others4
- Easy deployment via SSH3
- Ci3
- IAM3
- Nice to use3
- Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects2
- Beautiful2
- Self Hosted2
- Issues tracker2
- Easy source control and everything is backed up2
- Never dethroned2
- All in one development service2
- Good tools support2
- Free HTML hostings2
- IAM integration2
- Very Easy to Use2
- Easy to use2
- Leads the copycats2
- Free private repos2
- Profound1
- Dasf1
Pros of Glitch
- Bang! App built12
- Instant APPification ;)9
- Auto commits7
- No no. limitation on free projects4
- Easy to use3
- Tons of usable code2
- Awesome support2
- Very fast API creation. Especially for small apps2
- Github Integration1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GitHub
- Owned by micrcosoft55
- Expensive for lone developers that want private repos38
- Relatively slow product/feature release cadence15
- API scoping could be better10
- Only 3 collaborators for private repos9
- Limited featureset for issue management4
- Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens3
- GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions2
- No multilingual interface1
- Takes a long time to commit1
- Expensive1
Cons of Glitch
- UI could be better / cleaner5
- Limited Support/Diffficult to use Non-JS Languages2
- Automatically suspends proxies1
- Not good for big projects1
- Cannot delete project, only the source code is1