StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs Spinnaker

GitLab vs Spinnaker

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Spinnaker
Spinnaker
Stacks233
Followers358
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks1.2K

GitLab vs Spinnaker: What are the differences?

Introduction GitLab and Spinnaker are both popular software tools used in the software development process. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between these two tools that set them apart.

  1. Integration with CI/CD workflows: GitLab provides built-in CI/CD capabilities, allowing developers to seamlessly integrate their code changes and automate the software delivery process. On the other hand, Spinnaker is a dedicated continuous delivery tool that can be integrated with various CI tools, enabling more advanced deployment strategies and workflows.

  2. Scope and focus: GitLab is primarily a code collaboration platform that includes version control, issue tracking, and continuous integration features. It aims to provide an all-in-one solution for developers, encompassing the entire software development lifecycle. Spinnaker, on the other hand, focuses solely on continuous delivery, offering extensive support for deploying applications across multiple cloud environments.

  3. Deployment targets: GitLab supports a wide range of deployment targets, including on-premises servers and cloud platforms. It allows users to deploy applications to various environments such as Kubernetes clusters, virtual machines, and cloud services. Spinnaker, on the other hand, is particularly well-suited for cloud-native applications and provides native integrations with major cloud providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure.

  4. Deployment strategies: GitLab offers a set of predefined deployment strategies such as rolling updates and canary releases. However, its deployment strategies are relatively basic compared to the advanced deployment features offered by Spinnaker. Spinnaker provides more advanced deployment strategies like red/black deployments, automated canaries with analysis, and manual judgment stages, allowing for more complex and controlled release processes.

  5. Community and support: GitLab has a large and active community of users and contributors, making it easy to find support, resources, and extensions. It offers both a free community edition and a commercial enterprise edition with additional features and support options. Spinnaker also has a growing community, but it is relatively smaller compared to GitLab. However, Spinnaker has strong backing from major companies like Netflix and Google, which contributes to its ongoing development and popularity.

  6. Extensibility and integrations: GitLab provides a wide range of integrations with third-party tools and services, enabling developers to connect their workflows seamlessly. It also supports custom integrations through its APIs and webhooks. Spinnaker, on the other hand, is highly extensible and provides a flexible plugin architecture, allowing users to customize and extend its functionality to suit their specific deployment needs. It offers a rich set of built-in integrations with various CI services, cloud providers, and monitoring tools.

In summary, GitLab is a comprehensive code collaboration and CI/CD platform with extensive deployment capabilities, while Spinnaker is a dedicated continuous delivery tool focused on cloud-native applications. GitLab offers more out-of-the-box features and a larger community, while Spinnaker provides advanced deployment strategies and closer integration with major cloud providers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Spinnaker

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Spinnaker
Spinnaker

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
233
Followers
54.5K
Followers
358
Votes
2.5K
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 14
    Mature
Cons
  • 3
    No GitOps
  • 1
    Management overhead
  • 1
    Ease of use
  • 1
    Configuration time
Integrations
No integrations available
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Packer
Packer
Prometheus
Prometheus
Chef
Chef
Jenkins
Jenkins
Docker
Docker
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Spinnaker?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana