StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Game Engines
  4. Game Development
  5. Godot vs Panda3D

Godot vs Panda3D

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Panda3D
Panda3D
Stacks10
Followers32
Votes6
GitHub Stars4.9K
Forks847
Godot
Godot
Stacks222
Followers270
Votes47

Godot vs Panda3D: What are the differences?

Godot and Panda3D are both popular game engines for game development, each with its own set of strengths and features.
  1. Programming Language: One key difference between Godot and Panda3D is the programming language they use. Godot uses its own scripting language called GDScript, which is similar to Python, making it easy to learn for beginners. On the other hand, Panda3D supports multiple languages such as Python and C++, giving developers more flexibility but potentially requiring more expertise.

  2. Visual Editor: Another important difference is the visual editor provided by the engines. Godot offers a comprehensive visual editor that allows developers to create and manipulate game objects easily through a drag-and-drop interface. In contrast, Panda3D primarily relies on coding for game creation, with less focus on visual tools.

  3. Community Support: The community support and resources available for each engine also vary. Godot has a rapidly growing community that actively contributes tutorials, plugins, and assets, making it easy for developers to find help and resources. Panda3D, while it has a dedicated user base, may have fewer resources available compared to Godot.

  4. Platform Compatibility: When it comes to platform compatibility, Godot supports a wide range of platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and HTML5. Panda3D, while also compatible with multiple platforms, may require additional configuration and tweaking to ensure smooth performance across different devices.

  5. 3D Capabilities: In terms of 3D capabilities, Panda3D is known for its strong support for advanced rendering techniques and high-quality graphics. While Godot also supports 3D game development, Panda3D may be a better choice for projects that require sophisticated 3D visuals and effects.

In Summary, Godot and Panda3D differ in their supported programming languages, visual editing tools, community support, platform compatibility, and 3D capabilities, offering developers a range of options based on their specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Panda3D
Panda3D
Godot
Godot

It is a game engine that includes graphics, audio, I/O, collision detection, and other abilities relevant to the creation of 3D games.

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Shaders; Stencil, Render-to-texture; Rapid development; Extreme stability; Robustness
Innovative Design; Gorgeous 3d graphics; Create 2d games with ease; Script with full freedom; Debug and optimize
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
847
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
10
Stacks
222
Followers
32
Followers
270
Votes
6
Votes
47
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Excellent software reliability
  • 1
    Supports most popular Physics Engines
  • 1
    Supports browser deployment
  • 1
    Powerful profiling and debugging tools
  • 1
    Free, open-source, and permissive license
Cons
  • 1
    Direct3D Support is Behind
  • 1
    Limited Tutorial
  • 1
    Developer isn't Very Competent
  • 1
    No Unified EditingProgram
Pros
  • 14
    Open source
  • 7
    Cross-Platform
  • 7
    Easy to port
  • 7
    Supports both C++, C# and GDScript
  • 5
    Simple
Cons
  • 1
    Need opengl 2.1 / 3.3
  • 1
    Harder to learn
  • 1
    Performance in 3D
  • 1
    Somewhat poor 3D performance and lacks automatic LODs
Integrations
Firebase
Firebase
Felgo
Felgo
TestFlight
TestFlight
Vuforia
Vuforia
Ninject
Ninject
PlayFab
PlayFab
Helpshift
Helpshift
Pushwoosh
Pushwoosh
JetBrains Rider
JetBrains Rider
PlayFab
PlayFab
Ninject
Ninject
Vuforia
Vuforia
Pushwoosh
Pushwoosh
Helpshift
Helpshift

What are some alternatives to Panda3D, Godot?

Unity

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Unreal Engine

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Corona SDK

Corona SDK

It is a cross-platform framework ideal for rapidly creating apps and games for mobile devices and desktop systems. It builds rich mobile apps for iOS, Android, Kindle and Nook. Build high quality mobile apps in a fraction of the time.

Buildbox

Buildbox

It is the easiest drag and drop game maker software.Make your own games without coding and export them to iPhone, iPad, Android, Mac, PC and Microconsoles.

Amazon Lumberyard

Amazon Lumberyard

It is a game engine with no royalties or seat fees, frictionless integration with Twitch and AWS, plus much more on the horizon.

AppGameKit

AppGameKit

It is an easy to learn game development engine, ideal for Beginners, Hobbyists & Indie developers. It solves many problems caused by mobile device fragmentation. With it you can code your game once and then deploy your game to multiple platforms. Different resolutions and input systems are all easily handled by it.

Phaser

Phaser

It is a free open source HTML5 game framework. It uses Pixi.js for WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Games can be compiled to iOS and Android apps via 3rd party tools.

libGDX

libGDX

The framework provides an environment for rapid prototyping and fast iterations. Instead of deploying to Android/iOS/Javascript after each code change, you can run and debug your game on the desktop, natively. Desktop JVM features like code hotswapping reduce your iteration times considerably.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase