StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Google AI Platform vs Heroku

Google AI Platform vs Heroku

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
Google AI Platform
Google AI Platform
Stacks49
Followers119
Votes0

Google AI Platform vs Heroku: What are the differences?

<Google AI Platform and Heroku are popular platforms for deploying machine learning models and web applications, respectively. In this comparison, we will highlight key differences between Google AI Platform and Heroku.>

  1. Deployment Focus: Google AI Platform primarily focuses on deploying machine learning models trained using Google Cloud's AI services, making it suitable for ML engineers and data scientists. On the other hand, Heroku is designed for deploying web applications created using various programming languages and frameworks, catering more towards web developers.

  2. Integration with Google Cloud Services: Google AI Platform seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services such as BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and Dataflow, allowing for easy data processing and model deployment within the Google Cloud ecosystem. Heroku, while it can integrate with various third-party services, does not offer the same level of native integration with Google Cloud services.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Google AI Platform offers scalable infrastructure for deploying high-performance machine learning models that require significant computational resources. In contrast, Heroku provides a more straightforward scaling process for web applications but may not be as efficient for resource-intensive ML tasks.

  4. Managed Services vs. DIY Approach: Google AI Platform provides managed services for model deployment, monitoring, and versioning, streamlining the machine learning deployment process. Heroku, on the other hand, follows a do-it-yourself approach where developers have more control over the deployment process and configuration settings.

  5. Cost Structure: The pricing model for Google AI Platform is based on resource usage, with costs varying depending on factors such as model inference and storage. In comparison, Heroku offers a simpler pricing structure based on dyno types and add-on services, making it easier to estimate costs for hosting web applications.

  6. Community and Support: Google AI Platform benefits from Google Cloud's extensive documentation, support resources, and community forums, providing users with a robust support system. Heroku also has a strong community presence and support channels, often with a focus on web development best practices and troubleshooting.

In Summary, Google AI Platform is tailored for deploying machine learning models with deep integration into Google Cloud services, while Heroku is better suited for hosting web applications with a focus on scalability and ease of deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
Google AI Platform
Google AI Platform

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Makes it easy for machine learning developers, data scientists, and data engineers to take their ML projects from ideation to production and deployment, quickly and cost-effectively.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
“No lock-in” flexibility; Supports Kubeflow; Supports TensorFlow; Supports TPUs; Build portable ML pipelines; on-premises or on Google Cloud; TFX tools
Statistics
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
49
Followers
20.5K
Followers
119
Votes
3.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 7
    Storage
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
TensorFlow
TensorFlow
Google Cloud Dataflow
Google Cloud Dataflow
Kubeflow
Kubeflow

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Google AI Platform?

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase