Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Envoyer

58
80
+ 1
3
Google App Engine

10K
7.9K
+ 1
610
Add tool

Envoyer vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Envoyer and Google App Engine.

  1. Deployment Process: Envoyer simplifies the deployment process by providing a user-friendly interface and automating tasks like version control integration and server provisioning. On the other hand, Google App Engine offers a more robust and scalable deployment environment that automatically handles load balancing, scaling, and resource management without manual intervention.

  2. Supported Languages and Frameworks: Envoyer supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it versatile for various application development needs. In contrast, Google App Engine has more restrictions on supported languages and frameworks, primarily focusing on languages like Python, Java, PHP, and Go.

  3. Pricing Model: Envoyer operates on a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly fee based on the selected plan and usage. In contrast, Google App Engine offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on resource usage, providing more flexibility for fluctuating traffic demands.

  4. Scalability Options: Envoyer provides limited scalability options compared to Google App Engine, which can automatically scale resources based on demand. Google App Engine's scalability features enable applications to handle sudden traffic spikes and maintain optimal performance without manual intervention.

  5. Training and Support: Envoyer offers documentation and support resources to assist users in getting started with the platform and troubleshooting issues. In comparison, Google App Engine provides comprehensive technical documentation, online forums, and direct support options to help users navigate the platform and resolve any challenges they encounter.

In Summary, Envoyer and Google App Engine differ in deployment process, supported languages, pricing model, scalability options, and training/support resources available.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Envoyer
Pros of Google App Engine
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
  • 35
    Low cost
  • 32
    Comprehensive set of features
  • 28
    All services in one place
  • 22
    Simple scaling
  • 19
    Quick and reliable cloud servers
  • 6
    Granular Billing
  • 5
    Easy to develop and unit test
  • 4
    Monitoring gives comprehensive set of key indicators
  • 3
    Really easy to quickly bring up a full stack
  • 3
    Create APIs quickly with cloud endpoints
  • 2
    Mostly up
  • 2
    No Ops

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Envoyer?

Envoyer deploys your PHP applications with zero downtime. Just push your code, and let Envoyer deliver your application to one or many servers without interrupting a single customer. In this series, we'll discuss each feature of Envoyer, demonstrating how to use them with a sample project.

What is Google App Engine?

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Envoyer?
What companies use Google App Engine?
See which teams inside your own company are using Envoyer or Google App Engine.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Envoyer?
What tools integrate with Google App Engine?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Envoyer and Google App Engine?
Istio
Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.
Envoy
Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
linkerd
linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.
NGINX
nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
HAProxy
HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.
See all alternatives