Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Cloud Bigtable

138
363
+ 1
25
HBase

463
497
+ 1
15
Add tool

Google Cloud Bigtable vs HBase: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google Cloud Bigtable and HBase are both distributed, scalable, and high-performance NoSQL database systems. While they have similar functionalities, there are key differences between Google Cloud Bigtable and HBase that set them apart in terms of features and performance.

  1. Data Processing Model: Google Cloud Bigtable uses the concept of column families to organize data, where each column family can have multiple columns. This allows for faster data retrieval and efficient storage. On the other hand, HBase stores data in tables consisting of rows and columns, where each row can have multiple columns. This allows for more flexible data modeling but can result in slower data retrieval compared to Bigtable.

  2. Automatic Scaling: Google Cloud Bigtable provides automatic scaling of resources based on the workload, allowing applications to handle fluctuations in data size and read/write requests seamlessly. HBase requires manual intervention for scaling, which may involve adding or removing nodes from the cluster to adjust the capacity.

  3. Managed Service: Google Cloud Bigtable is provided as a fully managed service on Google Cloud Platform (GCP), taking care of operations like data replication, software updates, and hardware provisioning. On the other hand, HBase requires manual configuration and management, often involving setting up and maintaining a cluster of machines.

  4. Integration with Google Cloud Platform: Google Cloud Bigtable is tightly integrated with other services in the Google Cloud ecosystem, such as BigQuery and Dataflow, allowing for seamless data processing and analytics workflows. HBase, being an open-source project, can be integrated with other tools and platforms, but may require additional setup and customization.

  5. Data Durability and Replication: Google Cloud Bigtable provides built-in data replication and durability, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. It replicates data across multiple regions within GCP. HBase, on the other hand, relies on Apache Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) for replication, which may need additional configuration and management.

  6. Community and Support: HBase has a large and active open-source community, allowing for active development and support. It has been around for a longer time and has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of community-contributed tools and libraries. Google Cloud Bigtable, being a managed service, provides support through Google Cloud Platform, ensuring enterprise-level support and SLAs.

In summary, Google Cloud Bigtable and HBase differ in their data processing models, automatic scaling capabilities, managed service offerings, integration with other platforms, data durability and replication mechanisms, and community support. However, both provide scalable and distributed NoSQL database solutions suitable for various use cases.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Google Cloud Bigtable
Pros of HBase
  • 11
    High performance
  • 9
    Fully managed
  • 5
    High scalability
  • 9
    Performance
  • 5
    OLTP
  • 1
    Fast Point Queries

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

314
646
7K
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Google Cloud Bigtable?

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

What is HBase?

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Google Cloud Bigtable?
What companies use HBase?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Google Cloud Bigtable?
What tools integrate with HBase?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Jun 24 2020 at 4:42PM

Pinterest

Amazon S3KafkaHBase+4
4
1474
MySQLKafkaApache Spark+6
2
2099
What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Bigtable and HBase?
Google Cloud Datastore
Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.
Microsoft Access
It is an easy-to-use tool for creating business applications, from templates or from scratch. With its rich and intuitive design tools, it can help you create appealing and highly functional applications in a minimal amount of time.
Google Cloud Spanner
It is a globally distributed database service that gives developers a production-ready storage solution. It provides key features such as global transactions, strongly consistent reads, and automatic multi-site replication and failover.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.
See all alternatives