StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. Google Cloud Build vs Spinnaker

Google Cloud Build vs Spinnaker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spinnaker
Spinnaker
Stacks233
Followers358
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks1.2K
Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
Stacks808
Followers207
Votes4

Google Cloud Build vs Spinnaker: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Approach: Google Cloud Build is a continuous integration and delivery platform that is focused on building artifacts and deploying them to Google Cloud services. It follows a linear approach where each step depends on the completion of the previous one. On the other hand, Spinnaker is a multi-cloud continuous delivery platform that supports various cloud providers. It follows a parallel approach where it can deploy multiple instances simultaneously, making it more suitable for complex deployment scenarios.

  2. Pipeline Configuration: Google Cloud Build uses the configuration file called cloudbuild.yaml that defines the steps required for building and deploying the artifacts. It provides a declarative way to specify the actions to be executed. Whereas, Spinnaker offers a flexible and visual pipeline configuration where users can define stages, which are individual tasks or actions, and arrange them in a sequence to create a deployment pipeline.

  3. Integration and Orchestration: Google Cloud Build is tightly integrated with other Google Cloud services, allowing seamless integration with services like Cloud Source Repositories and Kubernetes Engine. It also offers a RESTful API for programmatic access. Spinnaker, on the other hand, is designed to integrate with multiple cloud providers and can orchestrate complex deployment workflows spanning across different cloud platforms.

  4. Rollback and Roll-forward: Google Cloud Build provides limited rollback capabilities by allowing users to revert to a previous successful build. However, it does not natively support complex roll-forward and roll-back strategies. In contrast, Spinnaker offers sophisticated rollback and roll-forward capabilities, allowing users to easily roll back to a previous stable version or roll forward to a new version in case of issues.

  5. Deployment Strategies: Google Cloud Build primarily focuses on deploying containerized applications using Docker images and Kubernetes manifests. It is well-suited for container-based deployments and provides native integration with Google Kubernetes Engine. On the other hand, Spinnaker supports a wide range of deployment strategies, including blue-green deployments, canary deployments, and rolling deployments, making it more versatile for different deployment scenarios.

  6. Community Support and Maturity: Google Cloud Build is a relatively newer service compared to Spinnaker, which has been in development and production use for several years. Spinnaker has a more mature and active community, offering extensive documentation, support forums, and plugins contributed by the community. Google Cloud Build is constantly evolving and gaining popularity but may have a more limited ecosystem compared to Spinnaker.

In Summary, Google Cloud Build is a focused CI/CD platform for Google Cloud services with a linear deployment approach, while Spinnaker is a multi-cloud CD platform with a parallel deployment approach, offering flexible pipeline configuration, extensive deployment strategies, and mature community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spinnaker
Spinnaker
Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

-
Commit to deploy in minutes; Choose what to build; Extremely fast builds; Automate your deployments; Define your custom workflow; Unparalleled privacy; Native Docker support; Generous free tier; Powerful insights; Identify vulnerabilities; Build locally or in the cloud
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
233
Stacks
808
Followers
358
Followers
207
Votes
14
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Mature
Cons
  • 3
    No GitOps
  • 1
    Configuration time
  • 1
    Management overhead
  • 1
    Ease of use
Pros
  • 2
    Container based
  • 2
    GCP easy integration
Cons
  • 2
    Vendor lock-in
Integrations
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Packer
Packer
Prometheus
Prometheus
Chef
Chef
Jenkins
Jenkins
Docker
Docker
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Spinnaker, Google Cloud Build?

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

AWS CodePipeline

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Harness.io

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Atmosly

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

Kraken Deploy

Kraken Deploy

Modern deployment platform with event-driven architecture, real-time monitoring, and enterprise security. The cloud-native alternative to Octopus Deploy.

DeployHQ

DeployHQ

A service packed with features to help you automate and manage the continuous deployment of your websites.

Gaia

Gaia

Gaia is an open source automation platform which makes it easy and fun to build powerful pipelines in any programming language. Based on HashiCorp's go-plugin and gRPC, gaia is efficient, fast, lightweight, and developer friendly.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana