Google Cloud Storage vs RunAbove

Overview

Google Cloud Storage

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.2K

Votes75

RunAbove

Stacks2

Followers13

Votes13

Google Cloud Storage vs RunAbove: What are the differences?

Google Cloud Storage: Durable and highly available object storage service. Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure; RunAbove: Extreme High-Performance Cloud Computing & Object Storage. We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

Google Cloud Storage and RunAbove can be primarily classified as "Cloud Storage" tools.

Some of the features offered by Google Cloud Storage are:

High Capacity and Scalability
Strong Data Consistency
Google Developers Console Projects

On the other hand, RunAbove provides the following key features:

OpenStack Nova and Swift API
Ready to use SDKs
Easy to use Runabove API

"Scalable" is the top reason why over 22 developers like Google Cloud Storage, while over 2 developers mention "SSDs" as the leading cause for choosing RunAbove.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Storage, RunAbove

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Storage	RunAbove
Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.	We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.
High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing	OpenStack Nova and Swift API;Ready to use SDKs;Easy to use Runabove API;Community Tutorials
Statistics
Stacks 2.0K	Stacks 2
Followers 1.2K	Followers 13
Votes 75	Votes 13
Pros & Cons
Pros 28 Scalable 19 Cheap 14 Reliable 9 Easy 3 Chealp	Pros 3 SSDs 1 Ubuntu 1 OVH 1 Horizon 1 Nova
Integrations
No integrations available	OpenStack

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Storage, RunAbove?

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by Google Cloud Storage are:

High Capacity and Scalability
Strong Data Consistency
Google Developers Console Projects

On the other hand, RunAbove provides the following key features:

OpenStack Nova and Swift API
Ready to use SDKs
Easy to use Runabove API

"Scalable" is the top reason why over 22 developers like Google Cloud Storage, while over 2 developers mention "SSDs" as the leading cause for choosing RunAbove.

Google Cloud Storage vs RunAbove