Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google Maps vs Swagger UI: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Google Maps and Swagger UI, highlighting the key differences between them in a concise manner.
API Documentation features: Google Maps primarily focuses on mapping and location-based services, providing extensive documentation regarding map functionalities, geolocation, and directions. On the other hand, Swagger UI is specifically designed for documenting and testing APIs, offering interactive documentation, code samples, and the ability to try out APIs directly from the documentation.
User Interface: Google Maps has a user-friendly interface that allows users to search for locations, explore maps, and get directions easily. It provides an interactive map with various layers and controls. In contrast, Swagger UI has a clean and minimalist interface with a focus on displaying APIs and their corresponding endpoints in a structured manner. It offers a more technical and developer-oriented interface.
Customization Options: Google Maps allows developers to customize map styles, markers, and layers according to their preferences. It offers extensive API options for controlling map behavior and appearance. In contrast, Swagger UI provides limited customization options in terms of branding and appearance. It is primarily designed to display standardized API documentation.
Testing Capabilities: Google Maps does not provide native tooling for testing APIs. It is mainly used for visualizing and interacting with maps and location-based services. On the other hand, Swagger UI offers built-in tools for testing APIs directly from the documentation. It allows developers to send requests, view responses, and explore different API endpoints.
Integration and Extensibility: Google Maps offers seamless integration with other Google services and APIs, allowing developers to leverage additional functionalities like geocoding or route optimization. It has a well-established ecosystem with various third-party libraries and plugins. Conversely, Swagger UI is more focused on being a standalone tool for documenting and testing APIs. It can be integrated into existing development frameworks but does not provide additional functionalities beyond API documentation.
Deployment and Hosting: Google Maps requires users to create a project and generate an API key for their websites or applications to access and use the map services. It follows a usage-based pricing model, charging users based on the number of requests made. In contrast, Swagger UI can be easily deployed as a static website or embedded within existing websites without requiring any API keys. It is an open-source project that can be hosted on any web server. The hosting and deployment costs are generally lower compared to Google Maps.
In Summary, Google Maps and Swagger UI differ in terms of their primary focus (maps vs. API documentation), user interface, customization options, testing capabilities, integrated functionalities, and deployment requirements.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
From a StackShare Community member: "We're a team of two starting to write a mobile app. The app will heavily rely on maps and this is where my partner and I are not seeing eye-to-eye. I would like to go with an open source solution like OpenStreetMap that is used by Apple & Foursquare. He would like to go with Google Maps since more apps use it and has better support (according to him). Mapbox is also an option but I don’t know much about it."
I use Mapbox because We need 3D maps and navigation, it has a great plugin for React and React Native which we use. Also the Mapbox Geocoder is great.
I use OpenStreetMap because that has a strong community. It takes some time to catch up with Google Maps, but OpenStreetMap will become great solution.
Google Maps is best because it is practically free (they give you $300 in free credits per month and it's really hard to go over the free tier unless you really mean business) and it's the best!
I use Google Maps because it has a lot of great features such as Google's rich APIs, geolocation functions, navigation search feature, street map view, auto-generated 3D city map.
I use OpenStreetMap because i have the control of the environment, using Docker containers or bare-metal servers.
Pros of Google Maps
- Free253
- Address input through maps api136
- Sharable Directions82
- Google Earth47
- Unique46
- Custom maps designing3
Pros of Swagger UI
- Open Source49
- Can execute api calls from the documentation34
- Free to use29
- Customizable19
- Easy to implement in .Net14
- Mature, clean spec13
- API Visualization12
- Coverage9
- Scaffolding6
- Easy to use6
- Vibrant and active community5
- Elegant4
- Adopted by tm forum api3
- Clear for React2
- Api1
- Can deploy API to AWS API Gateway and AWS Lambda1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Google Maps
- Google Attributions and logo4
- Only map allowed alongside google place autocomplete1
Cons of Swagger UI
- Need to learn YAML and RAML3
- Documentation doesn't look that good2
- Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages1
- You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting1
- Does not support hypermedia1
