Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GraphQL vs GraphQL Mesh: What are the differences?
Introduction: GraphQL and GraphQL Mesh are both frameworks used for building and querying APIs. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two that make them unique in their own ways.
TypeDef Language Support: GraphQL supports defining the schema and types using its own type definition language (SDL). On the other hand, GraphQL Mesh allows the use of multiple type definition languages, such as GraphQL SDL, Protobuf, OpenAPI, and Thrift, providing greater flexibility and interoperability.
Schema Stitching: GraphQL Mesh enables schema stitching, which allows combining multiple GraphQL schemas into a single unified schema. This allows developers to integrate existing GraphQL APIs and meshes together seamlessly, providing a unified interface to clients. GraphQL, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for schema stitching and requires additional tooling for this functionality.
Data Sources Integration: GraphQL Mesh provides a built-in way to integrate and connect data sources with various protocols into the GraphQL schema. This includes REST APIs, gRPC, SOAP, and more. GraphQL, however, requires the use of resolvers to connect to data sources, which needs to be implemented manually or using third-party libraries.
Automatic Proxy Generation: GraphQL Mesh can automatically generate proxies for external schema endpoints, including GraphQL APIs, REST APIs, and other supported protocols. This simplifies the process of connecting to external data sources and eliminates the need for manual proxy implementation. GraphQL does not have this built-in functionality and requires developers to manually create proxies.
Plugin System: GraphQL Mesh has a powerful plugin system that allows developers to extend its functionalities and customize the behavior of the generated schemas and resolvers. This helps in integrating additional features and handling complex scenarios with ease. GraphQL, on the other hand, does not have a built-in plugin system and relies on external libraries or custom code for extending its functionalities.
Code Generation and Language Support: GraphQL Mesh provides extensive code generation capabilities, allowing developers to generate client SDKs, type definitions, and resolvers for different programming languages. It also supports various query and code generation tools like GraphQL Code Generator. GraphQL, on the other hand, does not have built-in code generation capabilities and requires the use of external tools and libraries for code generation.
In summary, GraphQL Mesh offers more flexibility in terms of schema definition, data source integration, and schema stitching, while also providing features like automatic proxy generation, plugin system, and code generation capabilities. GraphQL, on the other hand, is focused on providing a powerful and efficient query language for APIs with the need for additional tooling for advanced features.
Pros of GraphQL
- Schemas defined by the requests made by the user75
- Will replace RESTful interfaces63
- The future of API's62
- The future of databases49
- Self-documenting13
- Get many resources in a single request12
- Query Language6
- Ask for what you need, get exactly that6
- Fetch different resources in one request3
- Type system3
- Evolve your API without versions3
- Ease of client creation2
- GraphiQL2
- Easy setup2
- "Open" document1
- Fast prototyping1
- Supports subscription1
- Standard1
- Good for apps that query at build time. (SSR/Gatsby)1
- 1. Describe your data1
- Better versioning1
- Backed by Facebook1
- Easy to learn1
Pros of GraphQL Mesh
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GraphQL
- Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology4
- More code to type.4
- Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.2
- No support for caching1
- All the pros sound like NFT pitches1
- No support for streaming1
- Works just like any other API at runtime1
- N+1 fetch problem1
- No built in security1