Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Grav vs Typo3: What are the differences?
Grav: A modern open source flat-file CMS. It is a free, open-source and self-hosted content management system (CMS) based on the PHP programming language and Symfony web application framework. It uses a flat file database for both backend and frontend. It is more widely used, and growing at a faster rate, than other leading flat-file CMS competitors; Typo3: Open Source Enterprise Content Management. It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.
Grav and Typo3 belong to "Self-Hosted Blogging / CMS" category of the tech stack.
Grav is an open source tool with 11.2K GitHub stars and 1.13K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Grav's open source repository on GitHub.
Siteway, GameDuell, and Q:MARKETING AG are some of the popular companies that use Typo3, whereas Grav is used by ONAMIX, Litural, and idéesculture. Typo3 has a broader approval, being mentioned in 17 company stacks & 6 developers stacks; compared to Grav, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.
Pros of Grav
- Easy to Update4
- No Databases3
- Fast Performance2
- Extensive Plugins2
- Strong Security2
- Full Control over customisation + functionality2
- Ligth storage use1
Pros of Typo3
- Great Security7
- Enterprise CMS6
- Open source5
- LTS and ELTS5
- Multi language4
- Customizable4
- Great upgrade tools4
- Page tree to organize sites3
- Scalable (raise with your needs)3
- Can be used headless / PWA2
- Many useful core features2
- Multi page system2
- Users / Groups management1
- Community1
- Modular extendable1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Grav
- Not easily to intergrate as an eCommerce (yet)2