StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Mobile Continuous Integration
  5. Greenhouse vs Workable

Greenhouse vs Workable

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Greenhouse
Greenhouse
Stacks71
Followers76
Votes34
Workable
Workable
Stacks27
Followers18
Votes0

Greenhouse vs Workable: What are the differences?

Introduction

When choosing between Greenhouse and Workable for your recruitment needs, it's important to understand the key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Customization Options: One of the key differences between Greenhouse and Workable is the level of customization available. Greenhouse offers highly customizable workflows, interview kits, and scorecards, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific hiring process. On the other hand, Workable provides a more standardized approach, with fewer options for customization.

  2. Integration Capabilities: Greenhouse comes with extensive integration capabilities, allowing users to easily connect with various third-party tools and services such as job boards, assessment providers, and HR systems. Workable also offers integrations but may have limitations compared to Greenhouse in terms of the number and depth of integrations available.

  3. Reporting and Analytics: Greenhouse provides robust reporting and analytics features, enabling users to track key metrics related to their recruitment process and analyze data to make informed decisions. Workable also offers reporting capabilities but may not be as advanced or customizable as Greenhouse’s reporting tools.

  4. Price Point: Price can be a significant differentiator between Greenhouse and Workable. Greenhouse is typically considered more expensive, especially for larger organizations or those requiring more advanced features and capabilities. Workable, on the other hand, may offer more affordable pricing options, making it a more budget-friendly choice for some users.

  5. User Interface and User Experience: Greenhouse is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive user experience, making it easier for recruiters and hiring managers to navigate the platform and perform tasks efficiently. Workable also offers a user-friendly interface but may not be as polished or intuitive as Greenhouse in terms of design and usability.

  6. Customer Support: Another area of difference between Greenhouse and Workable is their customer support offerings. Greenhouse is known for its dedicated customer support team that provides personalized assistance and guidance to users. Workable also offers customer support but may not have the same level of responsiveness or expertise as Greenhouse's support team.

In Summary, choosing between Greenhouse and Workable depends on your specific needs, budget, and preferences as each platform offers unique features and capabilities tailored to different user requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Greenhouse
Greenhouse
Workable
Workable

Greenhouse automatically builds your project for every commit you make and runs all your unit or UI tests on the emulator/simulator or on real hardware. Automatic build distribution is also supported so that your team and clients are always up to date with the latest state of your apps.

It is the world’s leading hiring platform. We help companies find, evaluate and hire better candidates, faster.

Supports Android, iOS, Cordova & Ionic apps;Free for up to 2 public or private repositories;Android- Gradle projects, iOS- Xcode build system and Facebook xctool, with full CocoaPods & Carthage integration.;Automated builds for every commit;Automated unit and UI tests;Version history & binary hosting;TestFlight & HockeyApp (and others) integration for build distribution;Support for feature branches and pull requests
Spend less time picking times with one-click calendar integrations and interview self-scheduling; Get answers faster with automated approval processes for job reqs, job offers and everything in-between; Share your success and compliance instantly with beautiful, accurate auto-generated reports.
Statistics
Stacks
71
Stacks
27
Followers
76
Followers
18
Votes
34
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Easy setup & usage
  • 6
    Great customer support
  • 6
    Free
  • 5
    Awesome team with awesome project
  • 3
    Great and fast builds
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
TestFlight
TestFlight
HockeyApp
HockeyApp
Beta by Crashlytics
Beta by Crashlytics
TestFairy
TestFairy
HipChat
HipChat
Slack
Slack
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
Ionic
Ionic
Zapier
Zapier
Userlane
Userlane
Geckoboard
Geckoboard

What are some alternatives to Greenhouse, Workable?

fastlane

fastlane

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Bitrise

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Codemagic

Codemagic

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

BambooHR

BambooHR

It collects and organizes all the information you gather throughout the employee life cycle, then helps you use it to achieve great things. Whether you’re hiring, onboarding, preparing compensation, or building culture, BambooHR gives you the time and insights to focus on your most important asset—your people.

Lever

Lever

Streamline your hiring process with an applicant tracking system that bridges the gap between recruiters and the rest of your team.

Recruitee

Recruitee

Fast, Easy, Collaborative recruiting platform. Save money on all major job boards. Create your own employer branded careers site. A tool to help you hire the best.

Freshteam

Freshteam

Freshteam is the HR software for growing businesses. With Freshteam, you can attract, hire and onboard new hires, offboard exiting employees, manage employee information, and time off - all in one place.

Breezy

Breezy

It is a recruiting platform for small and midsize businesses. The solution provides functionality for applicant sourcing and tracking, resume parsing, and video interviews and more. The application is cloud-based and features a dedicated app for iOS devices so recruiters can use the platform on the go.

Appcircle

Appcircle

Mobile CI/CD from small teams to on-premises Enterprise solutions, Appcircle is a mobile CI/CD platform that provides a fully automated environment to manage mobile app lifecycle end-to-end.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana