StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Load Balancer Reverse Proxy
  5. HAProxy vs Portainer

HAProxy vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HAProxy
HAProxy
Stacks2.6K
Followers2.1K
Votes564
Portainer
Portainer
Stacks507
Followers842
Votes146

HAProxy vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between HAProxy and Portainer. Both HAProxy and Portainer are widely used tools in the world of containers and can greatly enhance the performance and management of your application infrastructure. However, they have different functionalities and purposes. Let's explore the differences between them:

  1. Architecture and Functionality: HAProxy is a high-performance load balancer and reverse proxy server that distributes incoming network traffic across multiple servers. It allows for advanced routing and load balancing configurations, making it ideal for optimizing the performance and availability of web applications. Portainer, on the other hand, is a lightweight management tool that provides a user-friendly interface for managing containerized applications and their resources. It offers features like container monitoring, resource utilization tracking, and centralized management of multiple Docker environments.

  2. Deployment and Infrastructure: HAProxy is typically deployed as a standalone service or can be integrated into a containerized environment. It can be installed on dedicated servers or virtual machines to act as a front-end load balancer for distributing traffic to backend servers. Portainer, on the other hand, is usually deployed as a container itself. It can be easily installed and run on a Docker host or Kubernetes cluster to manage containerized environments and their associated resources.

  3. Configuration Complexity: HAProxy has a more complex configuration process compared to Portainer. It requires manual configuration of various parameters, such as backend servers, load balancing algorithms, health checks, and SSL certificates. This level of flexibility allows for fine-tuning and optimizing the load balancing behavior, but it also requires advanced knowledge and understanding of networking concepts. Portainer, on the other hand, provides a simplified and intuitive graphical interface for managing containerized environments. It abstracts away the complexities of manual configuration, making it accessible to users with less technical expertise.

  4. Scalability and Performance: HAProxy is designed to handle high traffic loads and can scale horizontally by adding more backend servers. It leverages efficient routing algorithms and load balancing techniques to optimize performance and ensure high availability. Portainer, on the other hand, focuses more on the management and monitoring aspects of containers. While it can handle a significant number of containerized applications, it may not provide the same level of performance and scalability as HAProxy when it comes to traffic routing and load balancing.

  5. Security and Access Control: HAProxy offers advanced security features such as SSL/TLS termination, client authentication, and access control lists (ACLs). These features allow for secure communication between users and backend servers, preventing unauthorized access and protecting sensitive data. Portainer also provides security features like user authentication and role-based access control (RBAC), but it may not offer the same level of granularity and advanced security options as HAProxy.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: HAProxy has a large and active community of users and developers. It has been widely adopted in production environments and has extensive documentation and community support. There are also various third-party tools and integrations available that extend its functionalities. Portainer, although relatively newer compared to HAProxy, has gained popularity due to its ease of use and intuitive interface. It has an active community and provides regular updates and improvements based on user feedback.

In summary, HAProxy is a powerful load balancer and reverse proxy server that specializes in optimizing network traffic distribution and ensuring high availability. It requires manual configuration and is suitable for users with advanced networking knowledge. Portainer, on the other hand, is a lightweight management tool with a user-friendly interface that simplifies container management and resource monitoring. It is ideal for users seeking an intuitive solution for managing containerized environments without the need for extensive technical expertise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HAProxy
HAProxy
Portainer
Portainer

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

-
Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
Stacks
2.6K
Stacks
507
Followers
2.1K
Followers
842
Votes
564
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 134
    Load balancer
  • 102
    High performance
  • 69
    Very fast
  • 58
    Proxying for tcp and http
  • 55
    SSL termination
Cons
  • 6
    Becomes your single point of failure
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to HAProxy, Portainer?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Traefik

Traefik

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana