StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Heroku vs Laravel Forge

Heroku vs Laravel Forge

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge
Stacks232
Followers273
Votes4

Heroku vs Laravel Forge: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here we will discuss the key differences between Heroku and Laravel Forge.

  1. Deployment Workflow: Heroku provides a straightforward and simplified deployment workflow, allowing developers to seamlessly deploy their applications from different source control platforms like Git. In contrast, Laravel Forge is a self-hosted platform that requires manual configuration and deployment steps. Developers need to set up the server, configure the domain, and manually deploy the application using Forge's user interface or command-line interface.

  2. Server Management: Heroku abstracts the server management layer, making it easy for developers to focus on the application code rather than managing the underlying infrastructure. Developers can scale their applications effortlessly, handle database management, and monitor logs from the Heroku Dashboard or command-line interface. On the other hand, Laravel Forge provides a comprehensive server management interface that allows developers to configure server settings, set up databases, and manage security easily.

  3. Application Monitoring and Metrics: Heroku provides built-in application monitoring and metrics through Heroku Metrics. With this feature, developers can easily track application performance, response times, error rates, and memory usage. Laravel Forge, on the other hand, does not offer built-in monitoring and metrics. Developers need to leverage third-party tools or manually configure monitoring solutions to track application performance.

  4. Cost Structure: Heroku offers a flexible pricing structure based on the resources needed for the application. Developers can start with a free tier for small applications and scale up as needed. Laravel Forge, on the other hand, follows a fixed pricing structure. Developers pay a monthly fee for accessing the Forge platform, regardless of the application size or resource usage.

  5. Supported Technologies: Heroku supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, including Node.js, Ruby, Python, and PHP. It integrates seamlessly with popular databases and add-ons. Laravel Forge, on the other hand, is specifically designed for PHP applications and integrating with PHP-based frameworks like Laravel. It provides optimized configurations and features tailored for PHP developers.

  6. Server Customization and Control: Heroku provides limited server customization options and provides an opinionated platform that abstracts away low-level server configurations. Laravel Forge, on the other hand, offers advanced server customization options, giving developers more control and flexibility over the server setup.

In summary, Heroku provides a simplified and abstracted platform for deploying and managing applications with broad language support and built-in monitoring, while Laravel Forge offers more control and customization options specifically targeting PHP applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Provision, host, and deploy PHP applications on AWS, DigitalOcean, and Linode.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
-
Statistics
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
232
Followers
20.5K
Followers
273
Votes
3.2K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    Storage
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
Pros
  • 4
    Simply to use
Cons
  • 2
    Monthly subscription
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Laravel Forge?

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot