Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Heroku vs OVH: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will outline the key differences between Heroku and OVH, two popular hosting providers. Below are the six key differences that distinguish these platforms from each other.
Pricing Structure: One of the main differences between Heroku and OVH is their pricing structure. Heroku offers a clear and transparent pricing model based on resources consumed, while OVH provides a variety of fixed price plans with different specifications. Heroku's pay-as-you-go approach allows for flexibility and cost control, especially for applications with varying demand. On the other hand, OVH's fixed plans may be more suitable for applications with predictable resource requirements.
Managed Services and Ease of Use: Heroku is a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) provider, which means it offers a higher level of abstraction and manages various aspects of application deployment and scaling automatically. OVH, on the other hand, provides Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), giving users more control but also requiring manual configuration and management. Heroku's managed services make it more beginner-friendly and reduce the operational burden, while OVH offers more flexibility for advanced users who require greater customization.
Scalability and Performance: Heroku provides a scalable platform with features like dynos and vertical scaling options, allowing rapid scaling of resources to handle sudden traffic spikes. OVH also offers scalability but requires manual configuration for load balancing and adding additional resources. Heroku's ease of use and automated scaling capabilities make it a preferred choice for fast-growing applications, while OVH's flexibility appeals to users who have specific performance requirements and want granular control over their infrastructure.
Availability and Reliability: Heroku guarantees a high level of availability and reliability by distributing applications across multiple servers and regions. OVH also provides reliable services, but the responsibility for ensuring availability falls on the user, as they need to set up load balancers and redundancy themselves. Heroku's built-in redundancy mechanisms and automated failover make it a reliable choice for mission-critical applications, whereas OVH requires additional setup efforts to achieve the same level of reliability.
Database Options: Heroku offers a range of managed databases, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, and Redis, which are seamlessly integrated into the platform. OVH provides dedicated servers that allow users to install and configure their preferred database software manually. Heroku's managed databases offer simplicity and ease of use, while OVH's approach suits users who require specific database configurations or want full control over their database environment.
Support and Documentation: Heroku provides comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and a responsive support team to help users troubleshoot issues and get started quickly. OVH also offers documentation and support channels but may not have the same level of community resources and dedicated support as Heroku. Heroku's focus on developer experience and support makes it a preferred choice for those who value readily available assistance.
In summary, Heroku and OVH differ in their pricing structure, managed services, scalability, availability, database options, and support/documentation. While Heroku offers a more managed and beginner-friendly experience with flexible pricing and automated scaling, OVH provides greater control and customization options for advanced users who require specific configurations and infrastructure control.
I'm transitioning to Render from heroku. The pricing scale matches my usage scale, yet it's just as easy to deploy. It's removed a lot of the devops that I don't like to deal with on setting up my own raw *nix box and makes deployment simple and easy!
Clustering I don't use clustering features at the moment but when i need to set up clustering of nodes and discoverability, render will enable that where Heroku would require that I use an external service like redis.
Restarts The restarts are annoying. I understand the reasoning, but I'd rather watch my service if its got a memory leak and work to fix it than to just assume that it has memory leaks and needs to restart.
Pros of Heroku
- Easy deployment703
- Free for side projects459
- Huge time-saver374
- Simple scaling348
- Low devops skills required261
- Easy setup190
- Add-ons for almost everything174
- Beginner friendly153
- Better for startups150
- Low learning curve133
- Postgres hosting48
- Easy to add collaborators41
- Faster development30
- Awesome documentation24
- Simple rollback19
- Focus on product, not deployment19
- Natural companion for rails development15
- Easy integration15
- Great customer support12
- GitHub integration8
- Painless & well documented6
- No-ops6
- I love that they make it free to launch a side project4
- Free4
- Great UI3
- Just works3
- PostgreSQL forking and following2
- MySQL extension2
- Security1
- Able to host stuff good like Discord Bot1
- Sec0
Pros of OVH
- Cost effective57
- Dedicated Hardware34
- DDoS Protection29
- Unmetered Bandwidth27
- Fun9
- SSH root access6
- Low cost4
- Fast delivery4
- Own network4
- Openstack4
- ceph4
- Ip address fail over support1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Heroku
- Super expensive27
- Not a whole lot of flexibility9
- No usable MySQL option7
- Storage7
- Low performance on free tier5
- 24/7 support is $1,000 per month2
Cons of OVH
- Incidents2