StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Heroku vs Zeit Now

Heroku vs Zeit Now

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
Vercel
Vercel
Stacks1.7K
Followers927
Votes86
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Heroku vs Zeit Now: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Heroku and Zeit Now

  1. Deployment Process: One key difference between Heroku and Zeit Now is their deployment process. Heroku follows a continuous integration and deployment model, where code changes are automatically deployed after passing the specified tests. On the other hand, Zeit Now provides instant deployments, allowing developers to deploy code instantly by simply pushing to their Git repository or running a basic shell command. This means that Zeit Now offers a more immediate and simplified deployment experience compared to Heroku.

  2. Serverless Architecture Support: Another difference between Heroku and Zeit Now is their support for serverless architectures. Heroku is based on the traditional concept of deploying applications on servers, where developers need to manage and scale their own server instances. In contrast, Zeit Now adopts a serverless approach, where developers can focus solely on building their applications without worrying about server management or scaling. Zeit Now automatically scales applications based on usage, making it more efficient and cost-effective for serverless architectures.

  3. Pricing Model: Heroku and Zeit Now also differ in their pricing models. Heroku offers a variety of pricing plans, including free tier options, based on the resources and features required by the application. The pricing is flexible, allowing developers to choose the appropriate plan based on their needs and budget. On the other hand, Zeit Now follows a consumption-based pricing model, where developers pay for the resources used by their applications in a pay-as-you-go manner. This can be beneficial for developers with fluctuating or unpredictable traffic, as they only pay for what they use.

  4. Deployment Environments: Heroku and Zeit Now have different approaches to deployment environments. Heroku provides a comprehensive platform with various deployment options, including pipelines for different environments like staging and production. Developers can easily manage and promote their applications through different stages of development using Heroku's intuitive interface. In contrast, Zeit Now primarily focuses on deploying single instances of an application. While Zeit Now does provide support for multiple environments, it doesn't offer the same level of environment management and promotion as Heroku.

  5. Infrastructure Control: The level of infrastructure control is also a distinguishing factor between Heroku and Zeit Now. With Heroku, developers have limited control over the underlying infrastructure as it is an integrated platform that abstracts away many infrastructure details. This can be advantageous for developers who prefer a more hands-off approach and want to focus solely on building their applications. In comparison, Zeit Now allows for more control over the infrastructure, offering options to customize runtime environments and infrastructure configurations according to specific project requirements.

  6. Integration Ecosystem: Lastly, Heroku and Zeit Now differ in their integration ecosystems. Heroku has a vast ecosystem of add-ons and integrations that provide additional functionality and services to enhance application development. Developers can easily integrate with various databases, third-party services, monitoring tools, and more through a wide range of Heroku add-ons. In contrast, Zeit Now offers a more lightweight ecosystem with fewer integrations and add-ons available. While Zeit Now does provide some built-in features and integrations, it may have fewer options compared to Heroku's extensive ecosystem.

In summary, Heroku and Zeit Now differ in their deployment process, support for serverless architectures, pricing models, deployment environments, level of infrastructure control, and integration ecosystems. Heroku offers a more continuous integration and deployment model, while Zeit Now provides instant deployments. Heroku is suitable for traditional server-based applications, while Zeit Now specializes in serverless architectures. Heroku has a flexible pricing model, while Zeit Now follows a consumption-based pricing model. Heroku offers comprehensive environment management, while Zeit Now focuses on deploying single instances. Heroku provides limited infrastructure control, while Zeit Now allows for more customization. Heroku has a vast integration ecosystem, while Zeit Now has a more lightweight ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
Vercel
Vercel

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
Easy, production-ready deployment with one command; Simple scaling, including auto-scaling; No-Ops; Domains & DNS;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
1.7K
Followers
20.5K
Followers
927
Votes
3.2K
Votes
86
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    Storage
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
Pros
  • 23
    Simple deployment
  • 17
    Free tier
  • 13
    Free SSL
  • 12
    Simple setup
  • 8
    Easy custom domain setup
Cons
  • 1
    Pricing Unclear
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Lighthouse
Lighthouse

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Vercel?

GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase