Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Hexo vs Hugo: What are the differences?
Introduction
Hexo and Hugo are two popular static site generators used to build websites. While both have similar goals, there are key differences between the two that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Hexo and Hugo.
Ease of use: Hexo and Hugo differ in terms of ease of use. Hexo is known for its simplicity and user-friendly interface, making it a great choice for beginners. On the other hand, Hugo has a steeper learning curve and requires some knowledge of the command line, making it more suitable for developers with a technical background.
Performance: One significant difference between Hexo and Hugo is their performance. Hugo is known for its exceptional speed and can generate websites incredibly fast, thanks to its static website generation process. Hexo, while still efficient, may not be as fast as Hugo when it comes to building larger websites or handling high levels of traffic.
Customization options: Hexo and Hugo offer different levels of customization. Hexo provides a range of themes and plugins that users can easily integrate into their websites, allowing for more flexibility in design and functionality. Hugo, on the other hand, is known for its powerful templating system, which gives users more control over the layout and structure of their websites, making it a better choice for those who require more complex customization options.
Language dependency: Another notable difference between Hexo and Hugo is their language dependency. Hexo is built with JavaScript, making it ideal for developers who are comfortable working with this programming language. In contrast, Hugo is built with Go, making it a suitable choice for developers who prefer working with Go or want to explore this language.
Community and support: Hexo and Hugo have active communities, but their support and community size differ. Hexo has a large and supportive community with plenty of resources, plugins, and themes available. Hugo, on the other hand, also has a strong community but is relatively smaller compared to Hexo, resulting in a slightly more limited range of available resources and a slightly longer learning curve.
Hosting options: Hexo and Hugo offer different hosting options. Hexo is often hosted on GitHub Pages, which is a free and easy-to-use hosting platform that integrates well with Hexo. While Hugo can also be hosted on GitHub Pages, it offers more hosting options due to its static site nature, allowing users to deploy their websites to various hosting platforms.
In summary, Hexo is known for its simplicity and ease of use, has extensive community support, and provides a wide range of themes and plugins. Hugo, on the other hand, offers exceptional performance and customization options, making it a great choice for developers who prefer more control over their website's layout and structure. Ultimately, the choice between Hexo and Hugo depends on the user's technical background, specific requirements, and preferences.
I have been building a website with Gatsby (for a small group of volunteers). I track it in GitHub and push it to Amazon S3.
I am satisfied with it as a single user; however, I would like to get non-technical teammates to be able to post Markdown blog posts. I tried to teach them to add mdx files, git push, gastby build, and publish with gatsby-plugin-s3, but I am getting a fair amount of resistance :).
So I wonder if there are tools, preferably using Node.js, that allow multi-user blog authors a la wordpress, i.e. with an interface for non technical bloggers, but producing static/pre-rendered web pages.
(PS: I am considering having a node/express.js server where they could upload their mdx file and the server would re-build push and publish for them, without having them install anything, but I'd like to know if something already exists before jumping into this endeavor)
If you're after Markdown I would look at https://www.netlifycms.org. I've used it on several projects to allow clients to use Markdown to publish and it integrates really well with Gatsby. You can create your own content structures using it then implement them into your templates. These are all the widgets you can use: https://www.netlifycms.org/docs/widgets/
This keeps it strictly static file driven with no database or need for express etc.
Hi everyone, I'm trying to decide which front-end tool, that will likely use server-side rendering (SSR), in hopes it'll be faster. The end-user will upload a document and they see text output on their screen (like SaaS or microservice). I read that Gatsby can also do SSR. Also want to add a headless CMS that is easy to use.
Backend is in Go. Open to ideas. Thank you.
If your purpose is plain simply to upload a file which can handle by backend service than Gatsby is good enough assuming you have other content pages which will benefit from faster page loads for those Headless CMS driven pages. But if you have more logical/functional aspects like deciding content/personalization at server side of web application than choose NextJS.
I have experience with Hugo and Next.js, but not with Gatsby. I would go with Next.js. However, I used Astro for my last project, so I would recommend Astro. Astro is much faster and you can use almost any frontend framework if you need to.
As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.
Pros of Hexo
- Ease of deployment18
- Uses NodeJS and npm13
- Easy GitHub Pages publishing12
- Powerful templating10
- Useful tools and plugins7
- Easy intergrating with js4
- Open source3
- Blazing Fast3
Pros of Hugo
- Lightning fast47
- Single Executable29
- Easy setup26
- Great development community24
- Open source23
- Write in golang13
- Not HTML only - JSON, RSS8
- Hacker mindset8
- LiveReload built in7
- Gitlab pages integration4
- Easy to customize themes4
- Very fast builds4
- Well documented3
- Fast builds3
- Easy to learn3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Hexo
Cons of Hugo
- No Plugins/Extensions4
- Template syntax not friendly2
- Quick builds1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Hexo?
What is Hugo?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Hexo?
What companies use Hugo?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Hexo?
What tools integrate with Hugo?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+22