Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Honeycomb
Honeycomb

19
30
+ 1
0
Inspeqtor
Inspeqtor

1
6
+ 1
1
Add tool

Honeycomb vs Inspeqtor: What are the differences?

What is Honeycomb? Observability for a distributed world--designed for high cardinality data and collaborative problem solving 馃悵馃挅. We built Honeycomb to answer the hard questions that come up when you're trying to operate your software鈥搕o debug microservices, serverless, distributed systems, polyglot persistence, containers, and a world of fast, parallel deploys.

What is Inspeqtor? Easy application infrastructure monitoring. Inspeqtor monitors your application infrastructure. It gathers and verifies key metrics from all the moving parts in your application and alerts you when something looks wrong. It understands the application deployment workflow so it won't bother you during a deploy.

Honeycomb and Inspeqtor can be primarily classified as "Performance Monitoring" tools.

Some of the features offered by Honeycomb are:

  • High-performance querying against high-cardinality or sparse events.
  • Accepts any structured JSON objects with a write key.
  • Submit events via API.

On the other hand, Inspeqtor provides the following key features:

  • Monitor init.d-, systemd-, upstart-, runit- or launchd-managed services
  • Monitor process memory and CPU usage
  • Monitor daemon-specific metrics (e.g. redis, memcached, mysql, nginx...)

Inspeqtor is an open source tool with 1.63K GitHub stars and 73 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Inspeqtor's open source repository on GitHub.

No Stats
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Honeycomb?

We built Honeycomb to answer the hard questions that come up when you're trying to operate your software鈥搕o debug microservices, serverless, distributed systems, polyglot persistence, containers, and a world of fast, parallel deploys.

What is Inspeqtor?

Inspeqtor monitors your application infrastructure. It gathers and verifies key metrics from all the moving parts in your application and alerts you when something looks wrong. It understands the application deployment workflow so it won't bother you during a deploy.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Honeycomb?
Why do developers choose Inspeqtor?
    Be the first to leave a pro
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Honeycomb?
        What companies use Inspeqtor?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Honeycomb?
        What tools integrate with Inspeqtor?
          No integrations found

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          What are some alternatives to Honeycomb and Inspeqtor?
          New Relic
          New Relic is the all-in-one web application performance tool that lets you see performance from the end user experience, through servers, and down to the line of application code.
          Datadog
          Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!
          ruxit
          Ruxit is a all-in-one performance monitoring solution for cloud natives. In under five minutes customizable dashboard views show you your application's performance data.
          Librato
          Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.
          AppDynamics
          AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.
          See all alternatives
          Decisions about Honeycomb and Inspeqtor
          Robert Zuber
          Robert Zuber
          CTO at CircleCI | 8 upvotes 96K views
          atCircleCICircleCI
          Looker
          Looker
          PostgreSQL
          PostgreSQL
          Amplitude
          Amplitude
          Segment
          Segment
          Rollbar
          Rollbar
          Honeycomb
          Honeycomb
          PagerDuty
          PagerDuty
          Datadog
          Datadog

          Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We鈥檝e got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We鈥檝e definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven鈥檛 had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We鈥檝e started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we鈥檝e seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.

          We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.

          See more
          Interest over time
          Reviews of Honeycomb and Inspeqtor
          No reviews found
          How developers use Honeycomb and Inspeqtor
          No items found
          How much does Honeycomb cost?
          How much does Inspeqtor cost?
          Pricing unavailable
          News about Inspeqtor
          More news