Honeycomb聽vs聽Network Polygraph

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Honeycomb
Honeycomb

19
30
+ 1
0
Network Polygraph
Network Polygraph

2
3
+ 1
3
Add tool

Honeycomb vs Network Polygraph: What are the differences?

Developers describe Honeycomb as "Observability for a distributed world--designed for high cardinality data and collaborative problem solving 馃悵馃挅". We built Honeycomb to answer the hard questions that come up when you're trying to operate your software鈥搕o debug microservices, serverless, distributed systems, polyglot persistence, containers, and a world of fast, parallel deploys. On the other hand, Network Polygraph is detailed as "See what happens in your network. Instant deployment, no extra hardware". Simply export your router's stats to our cloud. All major vendors supported via NetFlow/sFlow/IPFIX/jFlow.

Honeycomb and Network Polygraph can be categorized as "Performance Monitoring" tools.

Some of the features offered by Honeycomb are:

  • High-performance querying against high-cardinality or sparse events.
  • Accepts any structured JSON objects with a write key.
  • Submit events via API.

On the other hand, Network Polygraph provides the following key features:

  • Applications
  • Protocols
  • Top Talkers
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Honeycomb?

We built Honeycomb to answer the hard questions that come up when you're trying to operate your software鈥搕o debug microservices, serverless, distributed systems, polyglot persistence, containers, and a world of fast, parallel deploys.

What is Network Polygraph?

Simply export your router's stats to our cloud. All major vendors supported via NetFlow/sFlow/IPFIX/jFlow.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Honeycomb?
Why do developers choose Network Polygraph?
    Be the first to leave a pro
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Honeycomb?
        What companies use Network Polygraph?
          No companies found

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with Honeycomb?
          What tools integrate with Network Polygraph?
            No integrations found

            Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

            What are some alternatives to Honeycomb and Network Polygraph?
            New Relic
            New Relic is the all-in-one web application performance tool that lets you see performance from the end user experience, through servers, and down to the line of application code.
            Datadog
            Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!
            ruxit
            Ruxit is a all-in-one performance monitoring solution for cloud natives. In under five minutes customizable dashboard views show you your application's performance data.
            Librato
            Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.
            AppDynamics
            AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.
            See all alternatives
            Decisions about Honeycomb and Network Polygraph
            Robert Zuber
            Robert Zuber
            CTO at CircleCI | 8 upvotes 110K views
            atCircleCICircleCI
            Looker
            Looker
            PostgreSQL
            PostgreSQL
            Amplitude
            Amplitude
            Segment
            Segment
            Rollbar
            Rollbar
            Honeycomb
            Honeycomb
            PagerDuty
            PagerDuty
            Datadog
            Datadog

            Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We鈥檝e got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We鈥檝e definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven鈥檛 had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We鈥檝e started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we鈥檝e seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.

            We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.

            See more
            Interest over time
            Reviews of Honeycomb and Network Polygraph
            No reviews found
            How developers use Honeycomb and Network Polygraph
            No items found
            How much does Honeycomb cost?
            How much does Network Polygraph cost?
            News about Network Polygraph
            More news