Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Hound vs PullReview: What are the differences?
Developers describe Hound as "A hosted service that comments on Ruby style guide violations in your GitHub pull requests". Take care of pesky code reviews with a trusty Hound. Hound reviews GitHub pull requests for style guide violations. On the other hand, PullReview is detailed as "Automated code review for Ruby and Rails developers". PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.
Hound and PullReview can be categorized as "Code Review" tools.
Some of the features offered by Hound are:
- Open source
- Free for public repos
- Automated reviews of GitHub pull requests for style guide violations
On the other hand, PullReview provides the following key features:
- Review of Ruby and Javascript
- Review on feature branches
- Review on integrations branches
"Comments on style so I don't have to" is the primary reason why developers consider Hound over the competitors, whereas "Very detailed review of my code" was stated as the key factor in picking PullReview.
Hound is an open source tool with 1.72K GitHub stars and 393 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Hound's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Hound
- Comments on style so I don't have to4
- Easy configuration3
- Fast3
- Free for OSS2
- Inline comments2
Pros of PullReview
- Very detailed review of my code18
- Useful10
- Github integration9
- Feels like a teacher is helping me7
- Up to date inspections5
- Ease of setup5
- Free for OSS5
- Fix the problems before they reach the master branch4
- Just awesome3
- Rails only2
- Pullreview just made our life so much easier1
- Relevant SO discussions1