StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Web Service Automation
  5. IFTTT vs n8n

IFTTT vs n8n

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

IFTTT
IFTTT
Stacks297
Followers289
Votes72
n8n
n8n
Stacks265
Followers280
Votes59
GitHub Stars154.0K
Forks49.1K

IFTTT vs n8n: What are the differences?

Introduction

IFTTT and n8n are both popular automation and integration tools that allow users to connect different apps and services together to create automated workflows. While they share similar functionalities, there are some key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Pricing Model: One notable difference between IFTTT and n8n is their pricing model. IFTTT offers a free plan with limited features, as well as a subscription-based Pro plan that unlocks additional capabilities. In contrast, n8n is an open-source tool that is available for free and can be self-hosted, allowing users to have complete control and customization without any recurring costs.

  2. Node-based Workflow Editor: n8n offers a node-based workflow editor that allows users to visually create and customize workflows by dragging and dropping nodes. These nodes represent different triggers, actions, and data transformation processes. IFTTT, on the other hand, uses a simpler interface that comprises pre-built applets with limited customization options.

  3. Integration Capabilities: n8n provides a wider range of integration capabilities compared to IFTTT. While IFTTT supports many popular apps and services, n8n offers over 250 pre-built integrations out of the box, including both third-party services and internal tools. This gives users more flexibility and options when creating complex workflows that involve multiple apps.

  4. Customization and Scripting: n8n allows users to customize workflows using JavaScript, giving them more control and flexibility in implementing complex workflows with custom logic. IFTTT, on the other hand, does not provide similar customization options and relies on the pre-built functionalities provided by applets.

  5. Community and Support: n8n has a strong and growing community of users and contributors, which provides access to user-generated content, tutorials, and community support. IFTTT also has a community of users, but n8n's open-source nature encourages more active collaboration and knowledge sharing within the community.

  6. Self-hosted Option: One of the significant differences between IFTTT and n8n is the option to self-host n8n. This means that users can deploy n8n on their own infrastructure or cloud environment, giving them greater control over data security and privacy. IFTTT does not offer a self-hosted option, as it operates solely as a cloud-based service.

In summary, n8n offers a node-based workflow editor, extensive integration capabilities, customizability through scripting, open-source nature, and self-hosting options that set it apart from IFTTT's simpler interface, limited integration options, and cloud-only service.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

IFTTT
IFTTT
n8n
n8n

It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

Solutions by industry; Built for creators and makers; Customize with queries and code
Free / Open Source; Create own nodes to integrate third-party services or in-house tools;Decide who gets access and where your data is stored; Automate daily tasks; React to events; Easily extendable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
154.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
49.1K
Stacks
297
Stacks
265
Followers
289
Followers
280
Votes
72
Votes
59
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Lots of integrations
  • 17
    Free
  • 12
    Automates manual tasks
  • 11
    Life automation
  • 7
    Internet of things
Pros
  • 19
    Free
  • 10
    Easy to use
  • 9
    Easily extendable
  • 9
    Self-hostable
  • 6
    Easily exteandable
Integrations
No integrations available
Disqus
Disqus
GitHub
GitHub
Google Drive
Google Drive
GitLab
GitLab
Segment
Segment
Redis
Redis
HubSpot
HubSpot
Jira
Jira
Mailgun
Mailgun
Dropbox
Dropbox

What are some alternatives to IFTTT, n8n?

Zapier

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Integromat

Integromat

It is an easy to use, powerful tool with unique features for automating manual processes. Connect your favorite apps, services and devices with each other without having any programming skills.

Actionsflow

Actionsflow

It helps you to automate workflows, it's a free IFTTT/Zapier alternative for developers. With this tool, you can connect your favorite apps, data, and APIs, receive notifications of actions as they occur, sync files, collect data, and more.

bip.io

bip.io

bip.io is an open source web automation platform, making it easy to build powerful personal workflows from your favorite cloud services, applications and devices.

Microsoft Power Automate

Microsoft Power Automate

Microsoft Power Automate is a cloud-first, comprehensive automation platform, powered by low-code and AI. Modernize business processes, integrate operations at scale, and maintain visibility and control with enterprise-grade governance.

UiPath Studio

UiPath Studio

It encapsulates both simple and complex solutions for application integration and automating third-party applications, administrative IT tasks, and business IT processes.

Tray.io

Tray.io

It is cloud data integration platform designed for marketing, sales, and customer support teams of medium-sized companies and large enterprises.

Automate.io

Automate.io

Automate.io allows businesses to connect different cloud / SaaS applications, and automate workflows across (marketing, sales, and other internal processes). One can create simple one-to-one integrations to sync data or complex workflows across multiple applications. It helps create workflow bots on top of 100+ popular cloud applications - Salesforce, Google Apps, Trello, Hubspot, Quickbooks, Shopify and many more.

Huginn

Huginn

It is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. It's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack