Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
IFTTT vs n8n: What are the differences?
Introduction
IFTTT and n8n are both popular automation and integration tools that allow users to connect different apps and services together to create automated workflows. While they share similar functionalities, there are some key differences between the two platforms.
Pricing Model: One notable difference between IFTTT and n8n is their pricing model. IFTTT offers a free plan with limited features, as well as a subscription-based Pro plan that unlocks additional capabilities. In contrast, n8n is an open-source tool that is available for free and can be self-hosted, allowing users to have complete control and customization without any recurring costs.
Node-based Workflow Editor: n8n offers a node-based workflow editor that allows users to visually create and customize workflows by dragging and dropping nodes. These nodes represent different triggers, actions, and data transformation processes. IFTTT, on the other hand, uses a simpler interface that comprises pre-built applets with limited customization options.
Integration Capabilities: n8n provides a wider range of integration capabilities compared to IFTTT. While IFTTT supports many popular apps and services, n8n offers over 250 pre-built integrations out of the box, including both third-party services and internal tools. This gives users more flexibility and options when creating complex workflows that involve multiple apps.
Customization and Scripting: n8n allows users to customize workflows using JavaScript, giving them more control and flexibility in implementing complex workflows with custom logic. IFTTT, on the other hand, does not provide similar customization options and relies on the pre-built functionalities provided by applets.
Community and Support: n8n has a strong and growing community of users and contributors, which provides access to user-generated content, tutorials, and community support. IFTTT also has a community of users, but n8n's open-source nature encourages more active collaboration and knowledge sharing within the community.
Self-hosted Option: One of the significant differences between IFTTT and n8n is the option to self-host n8n. This means that users can deploy n8n on their own infrastructure or cloud environment, giving them greater control over data security and privacy. IFTTT does not offer a self-hosted option, as it operates solely as a cloud-based service.
In summary, n8n offers a node-based workflow editor, extensive integration capabilities, customizability through scripting, open-source nature, and self-hosting options that set it apart from IFTTT's simpler interface, limited integration options, and cloud-only service.
Pros of IFTTT
- Lots of integrations21
- Free17
- Automates manual tasks12
- Life automation11
- Internet of things7
- Good User Experiance2
- Mobile Application2
Pros of n8n
- Free19
- Easy to use10
- Self-hostable9
- Easily extendable9
- Powerful6
- Easily exteandable6