Instrumental vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Overview

Instrumental

Stacks16

Followers15

Votes7

ManageEngine Applications Manager

Stacks6

Followers4

Votes0

Instrumental vs ManageEngine Applications Manager: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Instrumental and ManageEngine Applications Manager are two popular monitoring tools used by organizations to track the performance of their applications and infrastructure. Each of these tools offers unique features and functionalities to meet the varying needs of users.

1. **Deployment Method**: Instrumental is a cloud-based monitoring tool, which means users do not have to worry about server maintenance or software updates. On the other hand, ManageEngine Applications Manager can be deployed on-premises, giving customers greater control over their data and security.

2. **Supported Environments**: Instrumental focuses primarily on monitoring Ruby and Python applications, while ManageEngine Applications Manager offers visibility into a wider range of technology stacks, including Java, .NET, and more. This makes ManageEngine a more versatile option for organizations with diverse application environments.

3. **Alerting Capabilities**: Instrumental provides advanced alerting with customizable thresholds and notifications via email or Slack. ManageEngine Applications Manager also offers robust alerting features but includes additional channels such as SMS and integrations with third-party tools like PagerDuty for more comprehensive alert management.

4. **User Interface**: Instrumental features a user-friendly interface with a minimalist design that focuses on providing key metrics at a glance. ManageEngine Applications Manager, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive dashboard with customizable widgets and drill-down capabilities for in-depth analysis.

5. **Cost**: Instrumental offers a straightforward pricing model based on the number of metrics tracked, making it a cost-effective option for small to medium-sized businesses. In contrast, ManageEngine Applications Manager uses a tiered pricing structure that can be more expensive for organizations with larger monitoring requirements.

6. **Community Support**: Instrumental has a smaller user community compared to ManageEngine Applications Manager, which has a larger user base. This can be a factor to consider when seeking community-driven support or networking opportunities.

In Summary, Instrumental and ManageEngine Applications Manager differ in deployment method, supported environments, alerting capabilities, user interface, cost, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Instrumental	ManageEngine Applications Manager
Instrumental is a real-time application and server monitoring platform. With over a million datapoints processed every second, we're one of the highest scale monitoring services.	It is an application performance monitoring solution that proactively monitors business applications and help businesses ensure their revenue-critical applications meet end user expectations. It offers out-of-the-box monitoring support for 80+ applications and servers.
Application monitoring - we accept any volume of arbitrary data, making it easy to set up graphs to measure the performance of your application in real time; Server monitoring - Ruby apps can use our instrumental tools gem to monitor information like CPU statistics, memory usage, disk space, and all the other things you'll need to monitor your servers. Language support - Ruby is supported using a custom library, and all other languages are supported with our Statsd backend; RESTful API - upon authentication, data is collected and returned in strict JSON format; Powerful query language - easily retrieve and graph a set of metrics matching a particular pattern; Highly scalable - Instrumental processes billions of data points per day; Built for teams - add team members, manage roles and permissions, and easily share graphs; Alerts - you can be notified via email, text message or at an http endpoint you control; Embedded graphs - create a graph and use it outside of the service with an embedded link;	Application Server Monitoring;Database Monitoring;Holistic View of IT Resources;Distributed Monitoring for High Scalability;Root Cause Analysis;Middleware/Portal Monitoring
Statistics
Stacks 16	Stacks 6
Followers 15	Followers 4
Votes 7	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Best, fastest, and easiest-to-use Interface 2 Simple, powerful, reasonably priced 1 Custom metrics done right 1 Offers free metrics	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	MongoDB Oracle PostgreSQL MySQL Hadoop Redis Memcached Cassandra IBM DB2 MSSQL

What are some alternatives to Instrumental, ManageEngine Applications Manager?

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Skylight

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

Librato

Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.

Keymetrics

PM2 is a production process manager for Node.js applications with a built-in load balancer. It allows you to keep applications alive forever, to reload them without downtime and to facilitate common system admin tasks.

Dynatrace

It is an AI-powered, full stack, automated performance management solution. It provides user experience analysis that identifies and resolves application performance issues faster than ever before.

Related Comparisons

Instrumental vs ManageEngine Applications Manager: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Instrumental and ManageEngine Applications Manager are two popular monitoring tools used by organizations to track the performance of their applications and infrastructure. Each of these tools offers unique features and functionalities to meet the varying needs of users.

1. **Deployment Method**: Instrumental is a cloud-based monitoring tool, which means users do not have to worry about server maintenance or software updates. On the other hand, ManageEngine Applications Manager can be deployed on-premises, giving customers greater control over their data and security.

2. **Supported Environments**: Instrumental focuses primarily on monitoring Ruby and Python applications, while ManageEngine Applications Manager offers visibility into a wider range of technology stacks, including Java, .NET, and more. This makes ManageEngine a more versatile option for organizations with diverse application environments.

3. **Alerting Capabilities**: Instrumental provides advanced alerting with customizable thresholds and notifications via email or Slack. ManageEngine Applications Manager also offers robust alerting features but includes additional channels such as SMS and integrations with third-party tools like PagerDuty for more comprehensive alert management.

4. **User Interface**: Instrumental features a user-friendly interface with a minimalist design that focuses on providing key metrics at a glance. ManageEngine Applications Manager, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive dashboard with customizable widgets and drill-down capabilities for in-depth analysis.

5. **Cost**: Instrumental offers a straightforward pricing model based on the number of metrics tracked, making it a cost-effective option for small to medium-sized businesses. In contrast, ManageEngine Applications Manager uses a tiered pricing structure that can be more expensive for organizations with larger monitoring requirements.

6. **Community Support**: Instrumental has a smaller user community compared to ManageEngine Applications Manager, which has a larger user base. This can be a factor to consider when seeking community-driven support or networking opportunities.

In Summary, Instrumental and ManageEngine Applications Manager differ in deployment method, supported environments, alerting capabilities, user interface, cost, and community support.

Instrumental vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Overview