Jelastic vs Kubernetes

Overview

Jelastic

Stacks38

Followers60

Votes74

Kubernetes

Stacks61.2K

Followers52.8K

Votes685

Jelastic vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Jelastic and Kubernetes

Jelastic and Kubernetes are two popular container orchestration platforms, but they have several key differences.

Deployment and Management: Jelastic provides a fully managed platform where users can deploy applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. In contrast, Kubernetes is a self-managed platform that requires users to set up and manage their own infrastructure.
Ease of Use: Jelastic aims to simplify the deployment and management process by providing a user-friendly interface and automating many tasks. On the other hand, Kubernetes has a steeper learning curve and requires a deeper understanding of containerization and infrastructure management.
Scaling: Jelastic offers automatic horizontal and vertical scaling capabilities, allowing applications to scale up or down based on demand. Kubernetes also supports scaling, but it requires manual configuration and management of scaling policies.
Platform Support: Jelastic is designed to support multi-cloud environments and can be deployed on various cloud providers. Kubernetes is also cloud-agnostic but requires additional configuration and setup to work across multiple platforms.
Pricing: Jelastic typically offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the resources they consume. Kubernetes is an open-source platform and does not have any direct pricing, but users are responsible for the costs associated with managing their infrastructure.
Ecosystem and Community: Kubernetes has a larger and more active community compared to Jelastic. This means there is a wealth of resources, documentation, and third-party integrations available for Kubernetes. Jelastic has a smaller community, but it provides dedicated support and assistance to its users.

In summary, Jelastic offers a fully managed and user-friendly platform with automatic scaling capabilities, multi-cloud support, and a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Kubernetes, on the other hand, is a self-managed platform with a steeper learning curve, manual scaling configuration, and a larger community ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jelastic, Kubernetes

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 27, 2020

Decidedon

GitHub

GitHub Pages

Markdown

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

@{GitHub}|tool:27| (incl. @{GitHub Pages}|tool:683|/@{Markdown}|tool:1147| for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
Respectively @{Git}|tool:1046| as revision control system
@{SourceTree}|tool:1599| as @{Git}|tool:1046| GUI
@{Visual Studio Code}|tool:4202| as IDE
@{CircleCI}|tool:190| for continuous integration (automatize development process)
@{Prettier}|tool:7035| / @{TSLint}|tool:5561| / @{ESLint}|tool:3337| as code linter
@{SonarQube}|tool:2638| as quality gate
@{Docker}|tool:586| as container management (incl. @{Docker Compose}|tool:3136| for multi-container application management)
@{VirtualBox}|tool:774| for operating system simulation tests
@{Kubernetes}|tool:1885| as cluster management for docker containers
@{Heroku}|tool:133| for deploying in test environments
@{nginx}|tool:1052| as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
@{SSLMate}|tool:2752| (using @{OpenSSL}|tool:3091|) for certificate management
@{Amazon EC2}|tool:18| (incl. @{Amazon S3}|tool:25|) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
@{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| as preferred database system
@{Redis}|tool:1031| as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.

12.8M views12.8M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jelastic	Kubernetes
Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.	Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
Public, Private, Hybrid and Multi-Cloud deployments;Support of microservices and legacy applications with zero code changes;Automated continuous integration, delivery and upgrade processes;More than 50 certified containers out-of-the-box;Managed multi-tenant Kubernetes and Docker containers support;Automatic vertical and horizontal scaling according to applications load;Superb developer web portal for easy provisioning, scaling and updating environments;Open API, CLI and SSH access;Automated replication for application servers and databases;Comprehensive billing engine, quotas and access control policies	Lightweight, simple and accessible;Built for a multi-cloud world, public, private or hybrid;Highly modular, designed so that all of its components are easily swappable
Statistics
Stacks 38	Stacks 61.2K
Followers 60	Followers 52.8K
Votes 74	Votes 685
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Automatic scaling 12 Pay-per-Use on an hourly basis 12 Managed hosting 8 Constantly evolving 6 Multiple hosting providers	Pros 166 Leading docker container management solution 130 Simple and powerful 108 Open source 76 Backed by google 58 The right abstractions Cons 16 Steep learning curve 15 Poor workflow for development 8 Orchestrates only infrastructure 4 High resource requirements for on-prem clusters 2 Too heavy for simple systems
Integrations
Spring Boot Jenkins Docker WordPress PostgreSQL NGINX MongoDB Cassandra GitLab Java	Vagrant Docker Rackspace Cloud Servers Microsoft Azure Google Compute Engine Ansible Google Kubernetes Engine

What are some alternatives to Jelastic, Kubernetes?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Related Comparisons

Jelastic vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Jelastic and Kubernetes

Jelastic and Kubernetes are two popular container orchestration platforms, but they have several key differences.

Deployment and Management: Jelastic provides a fully managed platform where users can deploy applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. In contrast, Kubernetes is a self-managed platform that requires users to set up and manage their own infrastructure.
Ease of Use: Jelastic aims to simplify the deployment and management process by providing a user-friendly interface and automating many tasks. On the other hand, Kubernetes has a steeper learning curve and requires a deeper understanding of containerization and infrastructure management.
Scaling: Jelastic offers automatic horizontal and vertical scaling capabilities, allowing applications to scale up or down based on demand. Kubernetes also supports scaling, but it requires manual configuration and management of scaling policies.
Platform Support: Jelastic is designed to support multi-cloud environments and can be deployed on various cloud providers. Kubernetes is also cloud-agnostic but requires additional configuration and setup to work across multiple platforms.
Pricing: Jelastic typically offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the resources they consume. Kubernetes is an open-source platform and does not have any direct pricing, but users are responsible for the costs associated with managing their infrastructure.
Ecosystem and Community: Kubernetes has a larger and more active community compared to Jelastic. This means there is a wealth of resources, documentation, and third-party integrations available for Kubernetes. Jelastic has a smaller community, but it provides dedicated support and assistance to its users.

Jelastic vs Kubernetes

Overview

Jelastic vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?