Jenkins vs Magnum CI

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Magnum CI

Stacks9

Followers21

Votes17

Jenkins vs Magnum CI: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of continuous integration tools, Jenkins and Magnum CI are two popular choices. Understanding the key differences between these two platforms can help in making informed decisions when it comes to selecting the most suitable tool for your specific needs.

Architecture: Jenkins is a self-hosted, open-source automation server that can be set up on any server or machine for running CI/CD pipelines. On the other hand, Magnum CI is a cloud-based solution, where users do not have to worry about maintaining infrastructure as the CI/CD pipelines run on Magnum CI servers in the cloud.
Ease of Use: Jenkins is known for its flexibility and customization options, making it highly configurable but also complex for beginners. Magnum CI, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use, with a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of setting up and managing CI/CD pipelines.
Pricing Model: Jenkins is an open-source tool with no direct costs associated with its usage. Users need to consider the infrastructure costs for running Jenkins on their own servers. Magnum CI, on the other hand, offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay for the resources and features they need, without the hassle of managing infrastructure.
Integration Ecosystem: Jenkins has a vast ecosystem of plugins that allow users to integrate with a wide range of tools and services, making it highly extensible. Magnum CI, while providing essential integrations, may have a more limited range of plugins and integrations compared to Jenkins.
Maintenance and Support: With Jenkins being a self-hosted solution, users are responsible for maintaining and updating the software, which can add to the workload. Magnum CI, as a cloud-based platform, handles maintenance and updates on the backend, reducing the maintenance burden on users.
Scalability: Jenkins may require additional configuration and setup to scale horizontally for handling larger workloads and more complex pipelines. Magnum CI, being a cloud-based solution, offers scalability options out of the box, allowing users to easily scale up or down based on their requirements.

In Summary, Jenkins and Magnum CI differ in terms of architecture, ease of use, pricing model, integration ecosystem, maintenance and support, and scalability, making each platform suitable for different use cases and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Magnum CI

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

Pedro Gil

Head of Engineering at lengoo GmbH

May 4, 2021

Decided

We replaced Jenkins with Github Actions for all our repositories hosted on Github. GA has two significant benefits for us compared to an external build tool: it's simpler, and it sits at eye level.

Its simplicity and smooth user experience makes it easier for all developers to adopt, giving them more autonomy.

Sitting at eye level means it's completely run and configured right alongside the code, so that it's easier to observe and adjust our builds as we go.

These two benefits have made "the build" less of a system engineer responsibility and more of a developer tool, giving developers more ownership from code to release.

77.7k views77.7k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Magnum CI
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	Magnum CI is a hosted continuous integration service for private projects. It supports multiple languages and tools to run test suite. Service supports all major version control software and integrates with most popular code hosting platforms. There are no restrictions or limitations on where you store your source code, so even your own self-hosted repository will work right away.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Easy Integration;Flexible Builds;Code Metrics; Build Notifications
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 9
Followers 50.4K	Followers 21
Votes 2.2K	Votes 17
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Lack of support 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines	Pros 6 Free 4 Easy setup 3 Github integration 2 Gitlab integration 1 Bitbucket integration
Integrations
No integrations available	Slack Flowdock HipChat Campfire GitHub Bitbucket Beanstalk

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Magnum CI?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

Jenkins vs Magnum CI: What are the differences?

Architecture: Jenkins is a self-hosted, open-source automation server that can be set up on any server or machine for running CI/CD pipelines. On the other hand, Magnum CI is a cloud-based solution, where users do not have to worry about maintaining infrastructure as the CI/CD pipelines run on Magnum CI servers in the cloud.
Ease of Use: Jenkins is known for its flexibility and customization options, making it highly configurable but also complex for beginners. Magnum CI, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use, with a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of setting up and managing CI/CD pipelines.
Pricing Model: Jenkins is an open-source tool with no direct costs associated with its usage. Users need to consider the infrastructure costs for running Jenkins on their own servers. Magnum CI, on the other hand, offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay for the resources and features they need, without the hassle of managing infrastructure.
Integration Ecosystem: Jenkins has a vast ecosystem of plugins that allow users to integrate with a wide range of tools and services, making it highly extensible. Magnum CI, while providing essential integrations, may have a more limited range of plugins and integrations compared to Jenkins.
Maintenance and Support: With Jenkins being a self-hosted solution, users are responsible for maintaining and updating the software, which can add to the workload. Magnum CI, as a cloud-based platform, handles maintenance and updates on the backend, reducing the maintenance burden on users.
Scalability: Jenkins may require additional configuration and setup to scale horizontally for handling larger workloads and more complex pipelines. Magnum CI, being a cloud-based solution, offers scalability options out of the box, allowing users to easily scale up or down based on their requirements.

Jenkins vs Magnum CI

Overview