StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs Snyk

Jenkins vs Snyk

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Snyk
Snyk
Stacks580
Followers380
Votes20

Jenkins vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide key differences between Jenkins and Snyk, focusing on six specific points.

  1. User Interface and Ease of Use: Jenkins is a powerful, extensible, and highly customizable automation server that requires advanced technical expertise to set up and configure. It offers a wide range of plugins and integrations but lacks an intuitive user interface, making it more suitable for technical users. On the other hand, Snyk is a developer-first tool with a user-friendly interface designed for simplicity and ease of use. It provides clear visibility and actionable insights to developers, making it easier to identify and fix security vulnerabilities in open-source libraries.

  2. Focus and Functionality: Jenkins primarily focuses on continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) processes, allowing teams to automate build, test, and deployment pipelines. It is highly flexible and can be customized to support a wide variety of workflows and integrations. In contrast, Snyk specializes in open-source security, providing vulnerability management and remediation solutions. It helps developers identify and fix vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies and containerized applications, ensuring secure coding practices.

  3. Deployment and Scalability: Jenkins is typically deployed on-premises or on self-managed infrastructure, requiring teams to handle the infrastructure setup, maintenance, and scalability. This provides greater control but also adds operational overhead. Snyk, on the other hand, is a cloud-native solution hosted on Snyk's infrastructure. It offers easy deployment and automatic scalability, allowing users to focus on their security tasks without worrying about infrastructure management.

  4. Integration Ecosystem: Jenkins has an extensive plugin ecosystem, providing integration with various tools, technologies, and platforms. This allows for seamless integration with popular development, testing, and deployment tools. Snyk also offers integrations with multiple development and DevOps tools, enabling easy integration with existing workflows. Additionally, Snyk provides native integrations with popular source code management systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, streamlining the vulnerability detection process.

  5. Security Scanning and Analysis: Jenkins supports security scanning through plugins, allowing users to integrate various scanning tools into the CI/CD pipelines. However, the scanning capabilities may vary based on the chosen plugins and configurations. In contrast, Snyk specializes in security scanning and provides deep vulnerability analysis for open-source dependencies. It accurately identifies vulnerabilities, provides detailed remediation advice, and even suggests alternative, secure dependencies.

  6. Reporting and Remediation Workflow: Jenkins offers basic reporting capabilities, but generating comprehensive vulnerability reports and managing remediation workflows may require additional plugin configurations or integrations with external tools. Snyk, on the other hand, provides advanced reporting dashboards that offer visibility into the security health of projects and workflows. It also facilitates the remediation process by automatically suggesting fixes and tracking progress, simplifying the vulnerability management workflow.

In summary, Jenkins is a versatile automation server primarily focused on CI/CD processes, while Snyk is a user-friendly tool specializing in open-source security. Jenkins requires technical expertise and offers extensive customization, whereas Snyk provides simplicity, comprehensive security analysis, and streamlined vulnerability management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Snyk

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
Bryan
Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceonWhiteSourceWhiteSourceSnykSnykSonatype NexusSonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Snyk
Snyk

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
580
Followers
50.4K
Followers
380
Votes
2.2K
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Pros
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 5
    Free for open source projects
  • 4
    Finds lots of real vulnerabilities
  • 1
    Easy to deployed
Cons
  • 2
    Does not integrated with SonarQube
  • 1
    False positives
  • 1
    Complex UI
  • 1
    No surface monitoring
  • 1
    No malware detection
Integrations
No integrations available
Scala
Scala
.NET
.NET
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Docker
Docker
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Snyk?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana