Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jest vs Nightwatchjs: What are the differences?
- Jest: Jest is a popular JavaScript testing framework that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It is often used for testing React applications but can also be used for testing any JavaScript code. One key difference with Jest is its built-in assertion library, which allows you to write tests without the need for additional assertion libraries.
- Nightwatchjs: Nightwatchjs, on the other hand, is an end-to-end testing framework that is primarily used for testing web applications. It provides a simple and intuitive API for interacting with web elements, making it easy to write tests for various browser actions. One key difference with Nightwatchjs is its support for multiple browsers, allowing you to run tests on different browsers simultaneously.
- Jest: Jest provides features like automatic mocking, snapshot testing, and code coverage reporting out of the box. This makes it easier to write and maintain tests, as well as to identify areas of your codebase that are not fully covered by your tests. Nightwatchjs does not have these built-in features and requires additional setup and plugins to achieve similar functionalities.
- Nightwatchjs: Nightwatchjs supports parallel test execution, which can significantly reduce the time required to run a large test suite. This is particularly useful for organizations with a fast-paced development cycle or large codebases. Jest does not have native support for parallel test execution and requires external tools or configurations to achieve similar performance improvements.
- Jest: Jest has a vibrant community and a wide range of plugins and extensions available. This allows you to easily extend and customize Jest to fit your testing needs. Nightwatchjs, while also having a community and plugin ecosystem, is generally less popular and may have fewer resources available for specific use cases or integrations.
- Nightwatchjs: Nightwatchjs provides extensive browser automation capabilities, including support for Selenium WebDriver. This allows you to test complex browser interactions, such as form submission, AJAX requests, and browser navigation. Jest, although it has basic browser capability through jsdom, does not have the same level of browser automation features as Nightwatchjs.
In summary, Jest is a JavaScript testing framework that focuses on simplicity and ease of use, with built-in assertion library and advanced testing features, while Nightwatchjs is an end-to-end testing framework primarily used for web applications, with support for multiple browsers, parallel test execution, and extensive browser automation capabilities.
As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.
Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.
Pros of Jest
- Open source36
- Mock by default makes testing much simpler32
- Testing React Native Apps23
- Parallel test running20
- Fast16
- Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing13
- Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests8
- Out of the box code coverage7
- Promise support7
- One stop shop for unit testing6
- Great documentation3
- Assert Library Included2
- Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu1
- Preset support1
- Can be used for BDD0
- Karma0
Pros of Nightwatchjs
- Open source3
- Testing2
- Automates browsers2
- Better cross browser (use selenium)1
- Cross-Browser Testing1
- Multiple Browser Support1
- Parallel Test Running1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Jest
- Documentation4
- Ambiguous configuration4
- Difficult3
- Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting2
- Multiple error messages for same error2
- Difficult to run single test/describe/file2
- Ambiguous2
- Bugged2
- BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail1
- Slow1
- Reporter is too general1
- Unstable1
- Bad docs1
- Still does't support .mjs files natively1
- Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests1
- Interaction with watch mode on terminal0
Cons of Nightwatchjs
- No automatic wait2
- Less flexibility1
- Limited native mobile app support1
- Limited browser support1
- Configuration complexity1