StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Jest vs Nightwatchjs

Jest vs Nightwatchjs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jest
Jest
Stacks15.2K
Followers4.1K
Votes175
Nightwatchjs
Nightwatchjs
Stacks214
Followers323
Votes11
GitHub Stars11.9K
Forks1.4K

Jest vs Nightwatchjs: What are the differences?

  1. Jest: Jest is a popular JavaScript testing framework that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It is often used for testing React applications but can also be used for testing any JavaScript code. One key difference with Jest is its built-in assertion library, which allows you to write tests without the need for additional assertion libraries.
  2. Nightwatchjs: Nightwatchjs, on the other hand, is an end-to-end testing framework that is primarily used for testing web applications. It provides a simple and intuitive API for interacting with web elements, making it easy to write tests for various browser actions. One key difference with Nightwatchjs is its support for multiple browsers, allowing you to run tests on different browsers simultaneously.
  3. Jest: Jest provides features like automatic mocking, snapshot testing, and code coverage reporting out of the box. This makes it easier to write and maintain tests, as well as to identify areas of your codebase that are not fully covered by your tests. Nightwatchjs does not have these built-in features and requires additional setup and plugins to achieve similar functionalities.
  4. Nightwatchjs: Nightwatchjs supports parallel test execution, which can significantly reduce the time required to run a large test suite. This is particularly useful for organizations with a fast-paced development cycle or large codebases. Jest does not have native support for parallel test execution and requires external tools or configurations to achieve similar performance improvements.
  5. Jest: Jest has a vibrant community and a wide range of plugins and extensions available. This allows you to easily extend and customize Jest to fit your testing needs. Nightwatchjs, while also having a community and plugin ecosystem, is generally less popular and may have fewer resources available for specific use cases or integrations.
  6. Nightwatchjs: Nightwatchjs provides extensive browser automation capabilities, including support for Selenium WebDriver. This allows you to test complex browser interactions, such as form submission, AJAX requests, and browser navigation. Jest, although it has basic browser capability through jsdom, does not have the same level of browser automation features as Nightwatchjs.

In summary, Jest is a JavaScript testing framework that focuses on simplicity and ease of use, with built-in assertion library and advanced testing features, while Nightwatchjs is an end-to-end testing framework primarily used for web applications, with support for multiple browsers, parallel test execution, and extensive browser automation capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jest, Nightwatchjs

Dane
Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceonCypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

290k views290k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jest
Jest
Nightwatchjs
Nightwatchjs

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Nightwatch.js is an easy to use Node.js based End-to-End (E2E) testing solution for browser based apps and websites. It uses the powerful Selenium WebDriver API to perform commands and assertions on DOM elements.

Familiar Approach: Built on top of the Jasmine test framework, using familiar expect(value).toBe(other) assertions;Mock by Default: Automatically mocks CommonJS modules returned by require(), making most existing code testable;Short Feedback Loop: DOM APIs are mocked and tests run in parallel via a small node.js command line utility
e2e; test; javascript; nodejs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
15.2K
Stacks
214
Followers
4.1K
Followers
323
Votes
175
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Open source
  • 32
    Mock by default makes testing much simpler
  • 23
    Testing React Native Apps
  • 20
    Parallel test running
  • 16
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Ambiguous configuration
  • 4
    Documentation
  • 3
    Difficult
  • 2
    Difficult to run single test/describe/file
  • 2
    Ambiguous
Pros
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Testing
  • 2
    Automates browsers
  • 1
    Better cross browser (use selenium)
  • 1
    Parallel Test Running
Cons
  • 2
    No automatic wait
  • 1
    Less flexibility
  • 1
    Configuration complexity
  • 1
    Limited native mobile app support
  • 1
    Limited browser support
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
Selenium
Selenium

What are some alternatives to Jest, Nightwatchjs?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana