Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jinja2 vs PureScript: What are the differences?
Developers describe Jinja2 as "Full featured template engine for Python". Jinja2 is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed. On the other hand, PureScript is detailed as "A strongly-typed language that compiles to Javascript". A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.
Jinja2 and PureScript can be primarily classified as "Templating Languages & Extensions" tools.
Jinja2 and PureScript are both open source tools. Jinja2 with 6.3K GitHub stars and 1.22K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than PureScript with 5.86K GitHub stars and 427 GitHub forks.
Pros of PureScript
- Purely functional6
- Great FFI to JavaScript4
- The best type system2
- Alternate backends2
- Pursuit1
- More Haskell-ish than Haskell1
- Coherent type classes1
- Libraries1
Cons of PureScript
- No JSX/Template1
- Have Some Bugs1
- Not so fancy error reporting1
What is PureScript?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use PureScript?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with PureScript?
Blog Posts
+17