Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
jQuery vs lodash: What are the differences?
Comparison: jQuery vs. Lodash
jQuery and Lodash are both popular JavaScript libraries used for simplifying and enhancing web development. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. Here are the main differences between jQuery and Lodash:
Utility vs. Full-featured Library: jQuery is primarily a utility library that provides a compact set of functions to simplify DOM manipulation, event handling, and AJAX requests. On the other hand, Lodash is a comprehensive utility library that offers a wide range of functions for common programming tasks, including data manipulation, array and object operations, functional programming, and more.
Cross-platform Compatibility: jQuery is designed to work across various web browsers, ensuring consistent behavior across different platforms. Lodash, on the other hand, focuses more on improving the performance and flexibility of JavaScript code, without placing as much emphasis on cross-browser compatibility.
Size and Performance: jQuery is known for its small file size and optimized performance, making it suitable for projects that require lightweight solutions. In contrast, Lodash provides many additional features and functions, which results in a larger file size and potentially slower performance in comparison.
Syntax and Function Names: jQuery often uses a concise and intuitive syntax that is easy to understand and use, especially for beginners. Lodash, on the other hand, employs a more functional and modular approach, using function names inspired by functional programming paradigms.
Community Support and Ecosystem: jQuery has a vast and established community with extensive documentation, tutorials, plugins, and online resources, making it easy to find help and solutions for specific problems. While Lodash also has good community support, its ecosystem might not be as extensive as jQuery's, as it is more focused on utility functions.
Modern JavaScript Features: jQuery is compatible with older versions of JavaScript, providing backward compatibility for legacy projects. In contrast, Lodash leverages modern JavaScript features and ES6+ syntax, offering advanced capabilities like arrow functions, modules, and built-in methods that are not found in the native JavaScript (pre-ES6) or jQuery.
In summary, jQuery is a lightweight utility library focused on DOM manipulation and web development tasks, while Lodash is a comprehensive utility library that offers a wider range of functionalities for JavaScript programming. Understanding the specific requirements of your project will help you determine which library is more suitable for your needs.
The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!
What do you think?
I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?
When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.
I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.
Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.
I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.
Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import
the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps.
Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.
Pros of jQuery
- Cross-browser1.3K
- Dom manipulation957
- Power809
- Open source660
- Plugins610
- Easy459
- Popular395
- Feature-rich350
- Html5281
- Light weight227
- Simple93
- Great community84
- CSS3 Compliant79
- Mobile friendly69
- Fast67
- Intuitive43
- Swiss Army knife for webdev42
- Huge Community35
- Easy to learn11
- Clean code4
- Because of Ajax request :)3
- Powerful2
- Nice2
- Just awesome2
- Used everywhere2
- Improves productivity1
- Javascript1
- Easy Setup1
- Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup1
- It Just Works1
- Industry acceptance1
- Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS1
- Widely Used1
- I love jQuery1
Pros of Lodash
- Better than Underscore2
- Simple1
- Better that Underscore0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of jQuery
- Large size6
- Sometimes inconsistent API5
- Encourages DOM as primary data source5
- Live events is overly complex feature2
Cons of Lodash
- It reduce the performance1