JSLint vs SonarQube

Overview

SonarQube

Stacks1.9K

Followers2.0K

Votes53

GitHub Stars10.0K

Forks2.1K

JSLint

Stacks88

Followers29

Votes0

JSLint vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Execution Environment: JSLint is primarily a JavaScript code quality tool that runs on the client-side within a web browser, while SonarQube is a more comprehensive and server-based platform that supports multiple programming languages in addition to JavaScript.
Customization Options: SonarQube offers more flexibility in terms of customization and rule configurations compared to JSLint, allowing users to tailor the analysis to specific project requirements and coding standards.
Integration Capabilities: SonarQube provides better integration with popular development environments and build systems, facilitating seamless integration into the software development workflow. JSLint, on the other hand, may require additional setup for integration with existing tools and processes.
Scalability and Performance: SonarQube is designed to handle large codebases and projects with its scalable architecture and performance optimization features, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. JSLint may be more suitable for smaller projects or individual developers due to its simpler setup and execution.
Reporting and Visualization: SonarQube offers advanced reporting capabilities and interactive visualization tools that provide in-depth insights into code quality metrics, trends, and project health. JSLint's reporting features are more basic and focused on identifying specific code issues rather than providing comprehensive project analysis.
Community Support and Updates: SonarQube has a larger user community and active development, ensuring regular updates, new features, and ongoing support. JSLint, while still maintained, may not receive updates or new features as frequently, potentially affecting compatibility with evolving JavaScript standards and best practices.

In Summary, JSLint and SonarQube differ in their execution environment, customization options, integration capabilities, scalability, reporting and visualization features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube	JSLint
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.	It is a static code analysis tool used in software development for checking if JavaScript source code complies with coding rules. It is provided primarily as a browser-based web application accessible through their domain, but there are also command-line adaptations.
Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 88
Followers 2.0K	Followers 29
Votes 53	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 26 Tracks code complexity and smell trends 16 IDE Integration 9 Complete code Review 2 Difficult to deploy Cons 7 Sales process is long and unfriendly 7 Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful 1 Does not integrate with Snyk	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins TeamCity Appveyor Travis CI Apache Ant Bamboo	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, JSLint?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

JSLint vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Execution Environment: JSLint is primarily a JavaScript code quality tool that runs on the client-side within a web browser, while SonarQube is a more comprehensive and server-based platform that supports multiple programming languages in addition to JavaScript.
Customization Options: SonarQube offers more flexibility in terms of customization and rule configurations compared to JSLint, allowing users to tailor the analysis to specific project requirements and coding standards.
Integration Capabilities: SonarQube provides better integration with popular development environments and build systems, facilitating seamless integration into the software development workflow. JSLint, on the other hand, may require additional setup for integration with existing tools and processes.
Scalability and Performance: SonarQube is designed to handle large codebases and projects with its scalable architecture and performance optimization features, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. JSLint may be more suitable for smaller projects or individual developers due to its simpler setup and execution.
Reporting and Visualization: SonarQube offers advanced reporting capabilities and interactive visualization tools that provide in-depth insights into code quality metrics, trends, and project health. JSLint's reporting features are more basic and focused on identifying specific code issues rather than providing comprehensive project analysis.
Community Support and Updates: SonarQube has a larger user community and active development, ensuring regular updates, new features, and ongoing support. JSLint, while still maintained, may not receive updates or new features as frequently, potentially affecting compatibility with evolving JavaScript standards and best practices.

In Summary, JSLint and SonarQube differ in their execution environment, customization options, integration capabilities, scalability, reporting and visualization features, and community support.

JSLint vs SonarQube

Overview