StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Julia vs Scala

Julia vs Scala

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Scala
Scala
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
GitHub Stars14.4K
Forks3.1K
Julia
Julia
Stacks666
Followers677
Votes171
GitHub Stars47.9K
Forks5.7K

Julia vs Scala: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Syntax: One key difference between Julia and Scala is their syntax. Julia has a simple and flexible syntax, similar to Python, which makes it easy to read and write code. On the other hand, Scala has a more complex syntax that blends functional and object-oriented programming paradigms, making it more powerful for certain use cases but also more difficult for beginners to grasp.

  2. 2. Type System: Another major difference between Julia and Scala is their type systems. Julia is a dynamically typed language, which means that variables can hold values of any type and their type can change at runtime. This flexibility allows for more concise code but can also lead to potential runtime errors. Scala, on the other hand, is a statically typed language, which means that variables must have a specific type at compile time. This enforced type safety can prevent many common programming mistakes but can also make the code more verbose.

  3. 3. Performance: Julia and Scala also differ in terms of performance. Julia is designed to be a high-performance language, with a just-in-time (JIT) compiler that optimizes code execution. This makes Julia well-suited for scientific computing and numerical simulations, where performance is crucial. Scala, on the other hand, is not as optimized for performance as Julia, but it runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), which allows it to leverage the vast ecosystem of Java libraries and frameworks.

  4. 4. Concurrency: Concurrency is another area where Julia and Scala differ. Julia has built-in support for lightweight threading, allowing multiple tasks to run concurrently. This makes it easy to write parallel code and take full advantage of modern multi-core processors. Scala, on the other hand, has a more complex concurrency model based on the Actor model, which allows developers to write scalable and fault-tolerant concurrent applications. This model requires more advanced knowledge and can be more difficult to master.

  5. 5. Community and Ecosystem: Julia and Scala also differ in terms of their community and ecosystem. Julia is a relatively new language with a growing but smaller community compared to Scala. However, Julia has gained popularity in the scientific computing community and has a growing ecosystem of packages and libraries tailored for scientific and data analysis tasks. Scala, on the other hand, has a larger and more mature community, with a wide range of libraries and frameworks available for web development, data processing, and other domains.

  6. 6. Learning Curve: The learning curve of Julia and Scala is another significant difference. Julia has a relatively low learning curve, especially for scientists and engineers familiar with Python or MATLAB, due to its simple syntax and high-level abstractions. On the other hand, Scala has a steeper learning curve, mainly because of its complex syntax and the need to understand functional programming concepts. Scala is more suitable for developers with a strong background in programming and experience with object-oriented or functional languages.

In Summary, Julia and Scala differ in syntax, type system, performance, concurrency model, community and ecosystem, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Scala, Julia

Nicholas
Nicholas

Jan 29, 2021

Decided

I am working in the domain of big data and machine learning. I am helping companies with bringing their machine learning models to the production. In many projects there is a tendency to port Python, PySpark code to Scala and Scala Spark.

This yields to longer time to market and a lot of mistakes due to necessity to understand and re-write the code. Also many libraries/apis that data scientists/machine learning practitioners use are not available in jvm ecosystem.

Simply, refactoring (if necessary) and organising the code of the data scientists by following best practices of software development is less error prone and faster comparing to re-write in Scala.

Pipeline orchestration tools such as Luigi/Airflow is python native and fits well to this picture.

I have heard some arguments against Python such as, it is slow, or it is hard to maintain due to its dynamically typed language. However cost/benefit of time consumed porting python code to java/scala alone would be enough as a counter-argument. ML pipelines rarerly contains a lot of code (if that is not the case, such as complex domain and significant amount of code, then scala would be a better fit).

In terms of performance, I did not see any issues with Python. It is not the fastest runtime around but ML applications are rarely time-critical (majority of them is batch based).

I still prefer Scala for developing APIs and for applications where the domain contains complex logic.

198k views198k
Comments
Alexander
Alexander

Senior researcher at MIPT

Oct 27, 2020

Decided

After writing a project in Julia we decided to stick with Kotlin. Julia is a nice language and has superb REPL support, but poor tooling and the lack of reproducibility of the program runs makes it too expensive to work with. Kotlin on the other hand now has nice Jupyter support, which mostly covers REPL requirements.

188k views188k
Comments
Jakub
Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

We needed to incorporate Big Data Framework for data stream analysis, specifically Apache Spark / Apache Storm. The three options of languages were most suitable for the job - Python, Java, Scala.

The winner was Python for the top of the class, high-performance data analysis libraries (NumPy, Pandas) written in C, quick learning curve, quick prototyping allowance, and a great connection with other future tools for machine learning as Tensorflow.

The whole code was shorter & more readable which made it easier to develop and maintain.

290k views290k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Scala
Scala
Julia
Julia

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.4K
GitHub Stars
47.9K
GitHub Forks
3.1K
GitHub Forks
5.7K
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
666
Followers
7.8K
Followers
677
Votes
1.5K
Votes
171
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 188
    Static typing
  • 178
    Pattern-matching
  • 175
    Jvm
  • 172
    Scala is fun
  • 138
    Types
Cons
  • 11
    Slow compilation time
  • 7
    Multiple ropes and styles to hang your self
  • 6
    Too few developers available
  • 4
    Complicated subtyping
  • 2
    My coworkers using scala are racist against other stuff
Pros
  • 25
    Fast Performance and Easy Experimentation
  • 22
    Designed for parallelism and distributed computation
  • 19
    Free and Open Source
  • 17
    Dynamic Type System
  • 17
    Calling C functions directly
Cons
  • 5
    Immature library management system
  • 4
    Slow program start
  • 3
    JIT compiler is very slow
  • 3
    Poor backwards compatibility
  • 2
    Bad tooling
Integrations
Java
Java
GitHub
GitHub
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
C++
C++
Rust
Rust
C lang
C lang
Stack Overflow
Stack Overflow
vscode.dev
vscode.dev
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Scala, Julia?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot