Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kadira vs Scout: What are the differences?
Developers describe Kadira as "Performance Monitoring for Meteor". See what’s going on with your app with different performance metrics and traces. Kadira tracks all your client and server errors automatically. You can profile your app in production or locally with Kadira and analyze it using an easy-to-use CPU analyzer. On the other hand, Scout is detailed as "Application Monitoring that Developers Love". Scout is application monitoring that points developers right to the source of problems: N+1 database queries, memory bloat, performance trends, and more Scout eliminates much of the investigation part when performance woes occur. .
Kadira and Scout can be categorized as "Performance Monitoring" tools.
Some of the features offered by Kadira are:
- Performance Metrics and Traces
- Error Tracking
- CPU Profiling
On the other hand, Scout provides the following key features:
- Monitors Ruby & Elixir apps with more languages to come
- Easy install
- Detailed transaction traces
"Best performance monitoring tool for the best framewor" is the top reason why over 8 developers like Kadira, while over 9 developers mention "Easy setup" as the leading cause for choosing Scout.
Kadira is an open source tool with 214 GitHub stars and 88 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Kadira's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Kadira
- Best performance monitoring tool for the best framewor9
- Drop in integration4
- Just Look2
Pros of Scout
- Easy setup8
- Plugins5
- Affordable3
- Custom Scopes1
- GIT Integration1
- Local Developer Tracing1
- Profiles Ruby Memory Usage1
- Heroku Integration1